0
What else can I help you with?
What is the difference between libel per se and libel per quod in defamation cases?
In defamation cases, libel per se refers to statements that are inherently harmful and do not require additional context to be considered defamatory. Libel per quod, on the other hand, requires additional context or explanation to understand why the statement is defamatory.
What is the difference between Dodge Journey SE and SXT?
What is the difference between a Dodge Journey SE and a Dodge Journey SXT
What is the difference between Matiz Se and Se plus and that about the safety?
se has not got electric windows like the se plus,otherwise no difference.
What is the official definition of per say?
"Per say" is Latin term meaning 'in itself', which is actually spelled per se. It is often used in defamation cases where a person is accused of the crime without proof.
What is the difference between oriental cooking and Asian cooking?
There is no difference, per se. It's just semantics. Asia was formerly known as the Orient, which is why the two are synonyms.
What is the difference between "per se" and "per quod" in legal terms?
In legal terms, "per se" means something is inherently or intrinsically illegal or wrong, while "per quod" means something is illegal or wrong only because of its surrounding circumstances or context.
Difference between Nissan almeera and almeera se?
i just want to know the difference between nissa almeera and Nissan almeers se. can you just explain about it
Difference between Honda civic SE and SI?
...the difference is in the second letter... ;)
What is the difference between representing oneself pro per and pro se in a legal case?
Representing oneself pro per and pro se both mean representing oneself in a legal case without a lawyer. The term "pro per" is commonly used in California courts, while "pro se" is more widely used in other states. The difference is mainly in the terminology used, but the concept is the same.
What is the difference between representing oneself in court as "pro per" and "pro se"?
Representing oneself in court as "pro per" means acting on behalf of oneself in a legal case, while "pro se" means representing oneself without a lawyer. The key difference is that "pro per" can refer to representing oneself with or without a lawyer's assistance, while "pro se" specifically means representing oneself without a lawyer.
What is difference between Honda Accord EX and SE trunk size?
No difference at all.
Do all plaintiffs in tort claims for defamation have the same elements to prove their case?
No, not in every case. There are two major differences. One is where the statements made are privileged under the First Amendment and the other is where the defamation is considered defamation per se. There is a First Amendment privilege governing statements made about public figures, especially statements by news sources. Ordinarily, malice on the part of the defamer is assumed if the statements are defamatory in nature. But in matters of public figures, the plaintiff has to prove actual malice. This requirement is designed to balance the interests of people in their right not to be defamed against the First Amendment guarantee of a free press. Another difference is when the defamation constitutes "libel or slander per se." Certain statements like accusation of commission of a crime are considered libel/slander per se. That means it is assumed that the defamed person suffered some injury to reputation, so the plaintiff does not have to that his or her reputation actually suffered. In all other cases, a plaintiff must prove that injury. Note that different states may have different standards as to what the formal elements of a defamation action are. Thus it is also possible that plaintiffs might have to prove different elements simply because of the particular state where the defamation occurred.
