0
What else can I help you with?
What is the term for courts debating the constitutionality of a law?
You may be thinking of the doctrine of judicial review, which allows courts to evaluate laws to determine whether they are constitutional. The law must be part of a case the court is hearing.
How did the courts change the standard they used to evaluate laws that affected women?
They replaced the reasonableness standard with intermediate scrutiny. yay Apex :P
How did the courts change the standard they use to evaluate laws that affected women?
They replaced the reasonableness standard with intermediate scrutiny. yay Apex :P
What is the definition of rational basis review and how does it apply to the evaluation of government actions?
Rational basis review is a legal standard used by courts to evaluate the constitutionality of government actions. Under this standard, the government action is considered valid if it is rationally related to a legitimate government interest. This means that the government action will be upheld as long as there is a reasonable justification for it, even if it is not the most optimal or efficient solution.
What is the power of the courts to determine the constitutionality of the law or other governmental action?
Judicial Review
What are the two types of cases handled by the federal courts?
Cases that have to do with laws or treaties and the constitutionality of laws.
Who makes sure laws do not violate the constitution?
The judicial branch of government, particularly the Supreme Court and lower courts, is responsible for ensuring that laws do not violate the Constitution. Through the process of judicial review, these courts have the authority to interpret the Constitution and evaluate the constitutionality of legislative and executive actions. If a law is found to be unconstitutional, the courts can strike it down. This system of checks and balances helps maintain the rule of law and protect individual rights.
What checks your courts?
Checks on the courts typically include judicial review, where higher courts can evaluate the decisions of lower courts for legality and constitutionality. Additionally, legislative oversight may involve creating laws that guide judicial processes or limit judicial power. Public opinion and media scrutiny also play vital roles in holding courts accountable to societal standards and values. Lastly, an independent judiciary is crucial to ensure that judges are free from external pressures, allowing them to uphold justice impartially.
What are the three types of discrimination scrutiny?
The three types of discrimination scrutiny are rational basis review, intermediate scrutiny, and strict scrutiny. These levels are used by courts to evaluate the constitutionality of laws that may discriminate against individuals or groups based on characteristics such as race, gender, or age.
What is a jadicial review?
Judicial review is the power of courts to evaluate the constitutionality of legislative and executive actions. This process ensures that laws and government actions comply with the Constitution, protecting individual rights and maintaining the rule of law. If a law or action is found unconstitutional, courts can invalidate it. Judicial review serves as a critical check on governmental power within a democratic system.
What does the Judaical branch do?
The judicial branch of government is the federal courts, mainly the Supreme Court. The courts interpret the laws that the legislative branch passes.
Can a state governor declare a stat law unconstitutional?
No, a state governor does not have the authority to declare a state law unconstitutional. The power to interpret the constitutionality of laws is vested in the judicial branch, specifically the state courts. While a governor can challenge a law or advocate for its repeal, only the courts can rule on its constitutionality.
