0
Pope John XXIII is the Pontiff who might have met with George Adamski regarding UFO incidents.
Specifically, George Adamski (April 17, 1891 - April 23, 1965) indicated that he had a secret meeting in 1963 with Pope John XXIII (November 25, 1881 - June 3, 1963). The meeting was prompted by Adamski's previous encounter with the Venusian messenger Orthon in the UFO incident of November 20, 1952. Adamski indicated that the Venusians had wanted to meet face-to-face with the Pope, but that the Pontiff had rejected direct interactions with space aliens. A satisfactory compromise was supposed to be the meeting with Adamski as the go-between.
In the aftermath of the meeting, Adamski had a "Golden Medal of Honor" that he identified as a papal gift. One side of the coin surrounded the papal profile with the words "Johannes XXIII Pont. Max.," which means "John XXIII, the Supreme Pontiff." The other side had the words "Ut Unum Sint Concilium Oecumenicum Vaticanum II," which means "That they may be one, Vatican Ecumenical Council II."
What else can I help you with?
Why might a scientist accept the actuality of George Adamski's round-trip to the moon in the UFO?
The viewing of millions of tiny firefly-like lights in the space between Planet Earth and the Moon was an observation that might persuade a scientist to consider accepting the actuality of a round-trip to the moon in George Adamski's encounter with the UFO and a space alien. Specifically, Adamski (April 17, 1891 - April 23, 1965) subsequently discussed the vast number of tiny lights that he saw on his trip to the Moon of November 20, 1952. His host was a Venusian messenger named Orthon. His vehicle was Orthon's own space transport. A similar observation about the tiny bright lights was made by the astronauts of the Apollo lunar flights of 1969-1972. Such an observation could not have been predicted by Earth viewers of Adamski's time.
Why might a scientist discount the actuality of George Adamski's round-trip to Venus in the UFO?
Conditions that get in the way of human survival on the second planet over from the Sun would tend to lead a scientist to discount the actuality of George Adamski's round-trip to Venus in the UFO. Specifically, Venus has a surface pressure that is 92 times that of Planet Earth's. The surface temperature averages out to 461.85 degrees Centigrade (864.33 degrees Fahrenheit). The planet is covered by clouds of corrosive, smelly sulfuric acid. Adamski's trips to Venus and to the Moon were outcomes of his meeting with Orthon, a Venusian messenger to Planet Earth, on November 20, 1952. Earthlings lack the technology, then or now, to survive either on or below Venus' surface. Adamski did not give any insights into whatever advanced technology allowed him and his host to survive.
Why might a scientist discount the actuality of George Adamski's round-trip to the Moon in the UFO?
An observation of cities, snow-capped mountains and trees on the far side of the moon would tend to lead a scientist towards discounting the actuality of George Adamski's round-trip to the Moon in the UFO incident. Specifically, George Adamski (April 17, 1891 - April 23, 1965) identified his visit as having occurred on November 20, 1952. He identified his pilot as Orthon, a Venusian who had picked him up on Planet Earth for visits to the Moon and to Venus. Both trips took place before lunar probes and manned flights proved that conditions were similar on both the near and the far lunar sides. But the thought that the far side would fare so much better than the near side had no basis in science, then or now.
What methods you might use reporting incidents in line with procedures?
just do what they say
When might an area command become a unified command?
when incidents are multi jurisdictional
What humorous incidents happen when you take a pet kangaroo for a walk on its leash?
It might poo on the road then you step in it or it might take you for a walk! :P
When might an area command become a unified commad?
When incidents are multi-jurisdictional or involve multiple agencies
Can an accident be called an incident?
Yes, an accident can be classified as an incident. The term "incident" is broader and encompasses any event, whether positive or negative, that occurs unexpectedly. However, not all incidents are accidents; for example, planned events or minor occurrences might be considered incidents without being accidents. In summary, while all accidents are incidents, not all incidents qualify as accidents.
Did George Washington have a family when he was fifty?
He might of but it might be hard to find out.
What different incidents might be recorded within health and social care settings?
i dont blody know im asking u
Which of these aspects of things fall apart might lead you to make inferences regarding?
Not enough information. Regarding what? See related questions.
At a carnival you might ride the invention of?
george ferris
