The fact is that the separation of church and state is often misinterpreted. It was not meant for people to use it to keep Christianity out of the U.S. government, but it was meant to keep the government out of the church. That is what England was doing and many colonists were different denominations and did not want a specific denomination to rule over the U.S. They wanted people to express their denomination freely, not become this radical hype many have turned it into.
Another answer:
The reverse is also true in that religion should not interfere in rights under the constitution. One religion's view of a right may not be the same as another religion and neither interpretation of the law should be selected over the other.
No I am not in favor of separation of church and state
the seperation of church and state --- nova-net beotch :)
No there was a state church.
Yes. He felt that the Constitution required a strict separation of church and state.
man who determined to build a colony that practiced separation of church and state
the words separation of church and state never appear in the constitution......
Some puritans did advocate for a degree of separation of church and state, believing that the church should have its own authority independent of the state. However, many puritans also believed in a close relationship between church and state, with the state supporting and enforcing the religious beliefs of the church.
No, separation of church and state.
It is part of the foundation of the US that there is a separation of church and state. Texas is one of 50 states therefore they follow the constitution.
How was a separation of church and state created
knZXsdxcxcad
Yes, it is.