They are called "precedents of law" and affect how similar present or future cases are decided.
Supreme Court decisions over the past 75 years clearly support the presumption of the unconstitutionality of prior restraint
The Supreme Court (or any other court) is very unlikely to reverse prior case law decisions. However to directly answer your question, decisions by court of any kind are "final" and require no ratification by anyone. Court decisions may be challenged by new legislation or Constitutional Amendments that try to modify the laws that the court's decisions originally addressed. The court might then have to decide on the new laws and/or amendments, but this would be a new court decision.
Common law is a system of law where previous decisions are passed down to the next case where applicable. Precedents of prior court decisions are used to govern future court cases. Equit is to be found not guilty.
A "slip op" or "slip opinion" is a legal opinion of a court that is published in a single paper format, prior to inclusion in a book of decisions of the court.
A binding precedent is precedent that a court MUST follow (it is law). All prior judicial decisions in a specific court's jurisdiction heard at that court's level or higher are considered to be binding precedent. In contrast, persuasive precedent is precedent that a court need not follow (it is NOT law, but, as the name suggests, may be persuasive because it suggests a line of reasoning). All prior judicial decisions OUTSIDE of that court's jurisdiction or from a LOWER court are considered to be persuasive only.
All court decisions are binding unless overturned by a higher court.
No, Congress cannot override decisions made by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States and its decisions are final and binding.
No, Congress cannot directly overrule decisions made by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's decisions are final and cannot be overturned by Congress.
No. When an appellate court hears an appeal from a lower court, it will either affirm (i.e.: approve of) the prior court's decision (not the case), or reverse the prior decision. If the prior decision is affirmed, then the prior holding stands.
The doctrine of stare decisis binds judges to follow precedents set by higher appellate courts under which jurisdiction the particular lower court falls.For example, in the federal court system US Supreme Court decisions create binding precedents for all US District Courts and US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts; however, Circuit Court decisions only set binding precedents for the US District Courts within their territorial jurisdiction.The exception to this is decisions of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which has nationwide jurisdiction (below that of the Supreme Court) over special subject-matter cases.
The court with jurisdiction has the authority to make decisions regarding custody.The court with jurisdiction has the authority to make decisions regarding custody.The court with jurisdiction has the authority to make decisions regarding custody.The court with jurisdiction has the authority to make decisions regarding custody.
The Supreme Court has made many decisions. Provide a case or subject and an answer can be given.