"Administrative" cases refer to cases heard by "Hearing Officers" (often referred to as 'judges' - with a small 'j') of the various administrative agencies of the Executive Branch of government, for violations of those agency's administrative rules and procedures.
Whereas, violations of ciminal and civil law (as passed by the Legislative Branch of government) are conducted in courts convened within the Judicial Branch of Government. l
The USFDA has administrative law judges which hear cases from its own administrative tribunal docket.
Brenda Grant has written: 'Administrative law through the cases' -- subject(s): Administrative law, Administrative procedure, Cases
John H. Reese has written: 'Administrative law' -- subject(s): Cases, Administrative law '1995 Statutory Supplement (Including Recent Cases) to Accompany Administrative Law' 'Administrative Law Desk Reference for Lawyers'
John M. Rogers has written: 'Administrative law' -- subject(s): Administrative procedure, Cases, Administrative law
Colleen M. Flood has written: 'Administrative law' -- subject(s): Administrative law, Cases
Not really sure about that
Rosanna L. Langer has written: 'Defining rights and wrongs' -- subject(s): Administrative agencies, Cases, Complaints (Administrative procedure), Human rights, Ontario Human Rights Commission 'Defining rights and wrongs' -- subject(s): Human rights, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Cases, Administrative agencies, Complaints (Administrative procedure)
Yes, appointed barangay officials can be subjected to administrative cases if they violate laws or regulations in their capacity as officials. Such cases can be filed against them for misconduct, neglect of duty, or other violations of administrative rules. The process typically follows the guidelines set forth in the Local Government Code and relevant administrative procedures. However, the specific rights and processes can vary based on local laws and regulations.
Yes, there is typically a prescriptive period for filing administrative cases, which varies depending on the specific laws and regulations governing the particular administrative body or issue involved. These time limits are established to ensure timely resolution and to protect the rights of all parties involved. It's essential to consult the relevant statutes or administrative guidelines to determine the exact prescriptive period applicable to a specific case.
The exclusionary rule, which prevents the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal cases, does not typically apply to administrative proceedings. Administrative agencies have their own rules and procedures, and while they may consider the legality of evidence, they are not bound by the same constitutional protections that govern criminal trials. However, some courts may apply similar principles to ensure fairness in administrative hearings. Overall, the application of the exclusionary rule in administrative cases is limited and varies by jurisdiction.
Double jeopardy, which prevents an individual from being tried twice for the same offense in criminal law, generally does not apply to administrative cases. Administrative proceedings are considered separate from criminal prosecutions, and individuals can face both criminal charges and administrative penalties for the same conduct. However, specific legal interpretations can vary by jurisdiction and the context of the case. Always consult legal counsel for advice on specific situations.
Geoffrey Philip Wilson has written: 'London United Tramways' -- subject(s): History, London United Tramways, Street-railroads 'Cases and materials on constitutional and administrative law' -- subject(s): Administrative law, Cases, Constitutional law