Claiming that human freedom should be absolute can lead to a disregard for the rights and freedoms of others, resulting in chaos and societal breakdown. It may justify harmful behaviors under the guise of personal liberty, undermining social cohesion and mutual respect. Additionally, absolute freedom can conflict with the need for laws and regulations that protect vulnerable populations and maintain order. Ultimately, it risks creating an imbalance where individual desires overshadow communal well-being.
Freedom should not be absolute, as unchecked freedom can lead to harm, injustice, and the infringement of others' rights. A balance must be struck between individual liberties and the well-being of society as a whole. Laws and regulations are necessary to protect vulnerable populations and maintain social order, ensuring that freedom enriches rather than undermines communal life. Ultimately, a responsible approach to freedom acknowledges its limits in the interest of preserving the common good.
Absolute cost should be well elaborated in the dictionary
Because that is the definition of absolute values
No one should have to die for freedom, but many do.
No -- and no one should believe in such obscure ideas of absolute authority.
Absolute monarchy
they dont why would theyy
No, that's why it's called freedom.
No, that's why it's called freedom.
No, "freedom of speech" should not be capitalized unless it is at the beginning of a sentence or part of a title.
Safely.
Absolutely.