Most states have laws that require the owner of porperty to post their property lines with No Trespassing signs, or Keep Out, something to that effect. If someone crosses that line, (this is key), and you catch them. You give them a written warning, the first time, and advice them to stay away or not to return. It helps if you can get an officer (whatever kind is avaiable) to the site while they are still there the first time. At least report the trespass and the written warning. The second time call the Sheriff, or whatever officers first, now you have the right to press charges, if it is the same person and the officer catches them. It is very hard to get this handled, recently in my state they changed the law to make it easier because of hunters using dogs. They cross posted land all the time and claim that they are only following their dogs. Of course, they release their dogs at the road in front of your property, where do you think the dogs are going? So, the Sheriff has started pressing charges themselves, if they catch the trespasser on your property, and it is the second time. This is still very hard to get charges pressed and to get them to stick. Mainly because it is so hard to catch the person on the property and then keep them on it until the law enforcment officers arrive to witness the event. I don't know what they are in TN, but I'm betting that they are similar through out the states. If you have a specific problem, I'd clarify the laws with my local Sheriff's Dept. in my county.
No Trespassing is a concept that has been recognized and enforced for centuries. The specific laws and regulations related to trespassing vary depending on the jurisdiction and can evolve over time.
Trespassing laws are the province of state and local law, unless Federal property is involved. As to states, the state legislatures change those laws. As to the Federal government, Congress changes those.
legislative
No, in Florida, a "No Trespassing" sign is not required in a private gated community for the trespassing law to be enforced. Trespassing laws still apply on private property regardless of whether signs are posted.
http://law.onecle.com/georgia/16/16-7-21.html
Yes, in some jurisdictions, a citizen can make a citizen's arrest for trespassing if they witness the trespassing occurring. However, it is important to be aware of the laws in your specific area regarding citizen's arrests and to exercise caution when attempting to make one.
Some relevant case laws regarding trespassing on public property include United States v. Jones (2012), which established that placing a GPS tracker on a vehicle without a warrant constitutes trespassing, and United States v. Katz (1967), which ruled that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in public spaces. These cases highlight the importance of understanding the legal boundaries of trespassing on public property.
Probably, with a warrant. Laws and regulations will vary between States and countries. A 'No Trespassing' sign is not likely to have any significance.
Trespassing can be considered both a civil offense and a criminal offense, depending on the circumstances and the laws of the specific jurisdiction. In general, trespassing on someone's property without permission is typically considered a criminal offense, while trespassing in a way that causes harm or damages property may also result in civil liability.
In Marion County, Florida, the statute of limitations for trespassing is typically one year. This means that charges for trespassing generally need to be filed within one year of the incident occurring. It's always best to consult with a legal professional for specific advice related to your case.
In Arizona, there are no specific laws that prohibit dumpster diving. However, trespassing laws may still apply if the owner of the property where the dumpster is located has posted "No Trespassing" signs or placed barriers around the dumpster. It's always a good idea to check local ordinances and regulations before engaging in dumpster diving.
The phrase "no trespassing" means that entry is not allowed on a property. On the other hand, "no trespassing vs no trespassing" does not make sense as it is repetitive and redundant.