Bill --> First reading, second reading --> Debate at House of Reps --> Third reading --> Yes or No? --> Yes: first reading, second reading --> Debate at senate --> Third reading --> Governor General.
I think like 3
The lawmaking process can be improved by removing some of the burdensome steps. If the process was did not rely breaking through bureaucratic red tape, it would be easier to pass and amend laws.
yes
No, skipping or reversing the order of steps in a process can lead to errors or inefficiencies. It is important to follow the steps in the correct sequence to achieve the desired outcome.
The lawmaking process differs depending what government a person has. In the U.S, a bill is a suggestion of a law that a congressman feels the country needs. The House of Reps. votes to either discuss the bill or wait. If it passes in the House and the Senate, it moves to the president who can sign it into law or veto it.
the order of the steps to be done
by being a sieve
England
Initiatives and referendums
Initiatives and referendums
The house can speed up the lawmaking process by taking the time to hear bills, and vote on them. Some bills simply die out because the house never votes on them.
Backtracking is the process whereby a certain number of steps are revisited, sometimes in a reverse order, in order to retrace one's steps.