The phrase "legal intentions" arises most frequently in connection with contract law. One's legal intentions are those intentions that a reasonable person would attribute to him on the basis of his words and behavior. Suppose Party A stands sits on the hood of an automobile and says to a passerby, Party B, "My car is for sale. You may buy it for $400." Party B says, "I'll take it..." He draws $400 from his wallet and tenders it to Party A.
Party A then explains, truthfully, that her car is located 50 mile away in her own driveway. The car on which she is sitting, she explains, is not hers and it is not the one she intended to sell.
By law, Party A offered to sell the car on which she was sitting, for that was her "legal intention." Under these circumstances, Party B as a reasonable person would conclude, that in saying "my car.." Party A meant to designate the car on which she was sitting and that, consequently, was her "legal intention." When Party B accepted her offer the two parties formed a contract for the purchase and sale of that car for $400.
Party A cannot, of course, sell a car she does not own. Nonetheless she formed a contract to do so and Party B has an action against her for breach. He is entitled to collect damages (equal to [fair market value of the car minus $400].
Rebuttable presumptions in contract law refer to legal assumptions that a court makes regarding certain facts or intentions of the parties involved in a contract, which can be challenged and overturned by evidence to the contrary. For example, a rebuttable presumption might suggest that parties intend to create a legally binding agreement when they sign a contract. However, if one party presents evidence showing that they did not intend to be bound, the presumption can be rebutted. This concept helps balance the need for stability in contractual agreements with the recognition of individual circumstances and intentions.
Otis H. Fisk has written: 'Presumptions in the law' -- subject(s): Presumptions (Law)
It depends on what your intentions are and if they're not protected by the state.
If you legally bought the music, and you have no intentions of selling or distributing it, then yes, you may put the music on anywhere you want.
A pressum, also known as a presumption, is a legal concept referring to an assumption made by a court or legal body that something is true until proven otherwise. It serves as a basis for legal reasoning, allowing for certain facts to be accepted without needing direct evidence. Presumptions can be rebuttable, meaning they can be challenged and overturned with evidence, or irrebuttable, meaning they cannot be contested. They play a crucial role in various areas of law, including family law and evidence.
A declaration is a formal statement or announcement that conveys information, expresses intentions, or asserts facts. It can be used in various contexts, such as legal documents, political statements, or personal affirmations. Declarations often serve to clarify positions or to make intentions known to a broader audience.
Lech Morawski has written: 'Domniemania a dowody prawnicze' -- subject(s): Circumstantial Evidence, Presumptions (Law)
The Bad Intentions was created in 2011.
Deadly Intentions was created in 1985.
The Best Intentions was created in 1992.
In Connecticut, the legal age of consent is 16, meaning that as long as both parties are over 16, it is generally legal for a 17-year-old to date a 19-year-old. However, it is important to consider the maturity and intentions of both individuals in the relationship.
The word intentions is a common plural noun. It requires no apostrophe.She had the best intentions.My intentions were made clear.If the word intentions has a possession or belonging, it needs an apostrophe. But I cannot think of an instance when "intentions" could own or possess anything! It would be the noun preceding intentions that needs the apostrophe.