adopting the constitution
the powers of the federal government are explicitly granted by the constitution
novanet- the powers of the federal government are explicitly granted by the constitution
he thought independence and being uniting was the only way to have a strong government
They didn't support the Constitution because they thought that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government.
They wanted it to made because it was important for the government to be nationalized.
Absolutely. Marshall was a loyal federalist who strongly believed in the value of the Constitution. As Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, he helped ensure the Articles of the Constitution empowered the federal government.
The Anti-Federalists were of the idea a weaker federal government in favor of stronger state legislatures and did not entertain the idea of a new constitution.
No. Because of the tendency of the Supreme Court to rule in favor of the federal government as well as the "supremacy clause" (Federal Laws override state laws if there is a conflict) in the constitution, the federal government exercises more authority and overall power than state governments.
President Jackson was in favor of loose construction because he believed in a broad interpretation of the Constitution. He viewed the federal government as having more power and authority, allowing it to take action in areas not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. This approach allowed him to pursue his policy agenda effectively.
Decentralists favored a strict interpretation of the Constitution.
Loose construction-means that the federal government can take reasonable actions that the constitution does not specifically forbidStrict construction- people who favor strict constitution think that that federal government should do only what the constitution specifically says it can do The Loose Construction Theory is when federalists interpret the Constitution into things that are in favor of a stronger national government. There are limitations involved.