There is no unwritten constitution, so no laws are made as a result of one.
The result was the first Roman code of written laws, the laws of the twelve Tables.
It depends which way you look at it: an unwritten constitution means more manoeuvrability when it comes to law changing or simply instigating constitutional changes. For example, during the early 1900s the British House of Lords had the ability to veto any Bill presented by the House of Commons it wanted, as long as it had a majority decision. The exception of this was if a Bill was finacially related (under a Unwritten Constitution), which in most cases suited the Lords fine. However, in 1913 a financial Bill was presented which, to cut a long story short, would result in the loss of the Lords' money and power. Because there was no strct constitution, the Lords simply ignored previous tradition and vetoed the Bill. In this way, the British unwritten Constitution is an advantage to one party, but a disadvantage to another. (The Bill was passed inevitably, when the house of commons sent through a law stating that the lords could no longer veto any bills at all, they got the support from the king and therefore the lords lost their power except they could now suspend bills but couldn't stop them.)
Unwritten laws can lead to confusion and inconsistency in their interpretation and enforcement, as they rely on subjective understandings. This can result in unequal treatment and injustice for individuals. Additionally, unwritten laws may lack accountability and transparency, making it difficult for people to understand their rights and responsibilities.
The US Constitution was written in 1789. There is no US Constitution of 1835.
failed to ratify the Constitution by a large margin
An astroclimate is a part or aspect of the climate which is a result of solar radiation.
No.
The constitution
The delegates elected George Washington to preside over the convention. The result of the Convention was the United States Constitution.
See links for interesting articles. The UK Constitution is not codified as is the US Constitution, but the basic concept is that of Parliamentary Supremacy. In other words, Constitutional law exists as a result of, and is therefore changed by, acts of Parliament. The US Constitution, in contrast, is codified. There are advantages to both systems. The UK system is more fluid, and it takes an immense effort for the US Constitution to be amended. On the other hand, the US Constitution gives direction and parameters to the branches of government, while also establishing the rights and powers of the states, and a mechanism to bring about the most far-reaching changes with as little disruption as possible.
The constitution of the new State of California.
Absolutely not. Parties are not even mentioned in the Constitution. Parties were a result of differing political views, though not mentioned in the constitution, they are not banned either.