One characteristic that least applies to bureaucracies is flexibility. Bureaucracies are typically marked by rigid hierarchical structures and standardized procedures, which can limit adaptability and responsiveness to change. Additionally, informal communication and personal relationships often take a backseat to formal rules and regulations in bureaucratic settings. This can hinder innovation and responsiveness, making bureaucracies less agile compared to more dynamic organizational forms.
The term "non-characteristic" is meaningless. If the question means to ask "What things are not characteristics of bureaucracies?", then anything other than what a bureaucracy is (organization of government where state officials and agencies process important information) is not a bureaucracy. For example: animals are not bureaucracies. Chieftains and tribal leaders do not have bureaucracies. You cannot eat a bureaucracy, etc.
The term "non-characteristic" is meaningless. If the question means to ask "What things are not characteristics of bureaucracies?", then anything other than what a bureaucracy is (organization of government where state officials and agencies process important information) is not a bureaucracy. For example: animals are not bureaucracies. Chieftains and tribal leaders do not have bureaucracies. You cannot eat a bureaucracy, etc.
Are not organized to make a profit
Bureaucracies are large administrative institutions and they are ususally schools, ministries, libraries, courts of law, hospitals, etc.
There is a chain of command shaped like a pyramid
yes
They have complex producers
They have complex producers
none of the answers are true so pick > none of the above are true of congressional oversight of bureaucracies
Despondent!
No
His book Catch 22 indicated his beliefs that bureaucracies got into the way of smooth military operations