0
What else can I help you with?
What compromise did the federalists make in order to ensure ratification in Virginia and New York?
The Bill of Rights was included in the United States Constitution to ensure ratification in Virginia and New York. The Bill of Rights includes the first 10 amendments to the Constitution and guarantees certain rights to citizens.
How did the Philadelphia convention delegates ensure ratification of the constitution?
The delegates of the Constitutional Convention added the Bill of Rights to the Constitution as a compromise between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to ensure ratification. This limited the power of the federal government and solidified power for the states.
What compromise was agreed upon by federalists and anti federalists to ensure ratification of the new constitution?
they compromised with the bill of rights that was not originally in the constitution
What was the anti-federalists point of view about the ratification of the Constitution?
The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the Constitution primarily because they feared that it would create a strong central government that could threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty. They argued that the Constitution lacked a Bill of Rights to protect citizens' freedoms and that the proposed government structure favored the elite over the common people. Anti-Federalists believed that a more decentralized system, which preserved greater power for the states, was essential to safeguard democracy and prevent tyranny. Their concerns ultimately led to the adoption of the Bill of Rights as a compromise to ensure protection of individual freedoms.
What two states were not part of the nine to legally ratify the constitution but were sought for ratification in order to ensure a strong backing of the constitution?
The two states sought to ensure strong backing for ratification of The Constitution of the United States were Delaware and Pennsylvania. These were the first two states to sign.
What was the primary objection of the anti federalists to ratification of the constitution?
The primary objection of the Anti-Federalists to the ratification of the Constitution was the fear of a strong central government that could threaten individual liberties and states' rights. They argued that the Constitution lacked a Bill of Rights to explicitly protect citizens' freedoms. Additionally, they were concerned that the proposed system favored wealthy elites and would lead to the erosion of democratic principles. Overall, the Anti-Federalists sought to preserve the autonomy of states and ensure that government remained accountable to the people.
Who urged the ratification of the Constitution would have been MOST likely to join which political party?
Those who urged the ratification of the Constitution, known as the Federalists, would have been most likely to join the Federalist Party. This party, formed in the early years of the United States, supported a strong central government and the principles outlined in the Constitution. Prominent Federalists included figures like Alexander Hamilton and John Adams, who advocated for a robust federal authority to ensure stability and economic growth.
How did the Framers use compromise to ensure that the Constitution would reflect different points of view?
The Framers of the Constitution employed compromise to address the diverse interests and concerns of various states and groups. The Great Compromise combined the Virginia Plan's emphasis on representation based on population with the New Jersey Plan's call for equal representation for all states in the Senate. Additionally, the Three-Fifths Compromise addressed disputes over slavery by counting enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person for representation purposes. These compromises were essential in creating a balanced framework that could garner broad support and facilitate the ratification of the Constitution.
Describe the battle for ratification between federalists and anti-federalists using the arguments made in the federalist papers No 51 and 78?
The battle for ratification between Federalists and Anti-Federalists centered on the balance of power and the protection of individual rights. In Federalist No. 51, James Madison argued for the necessity of checks and balances within government to prevent tyranny and ensure that each branch would be independent while still accountable to the people. Meanwhile, Federalist No. 78, authored by Alexander Hamilton, emphasized the importance of an independent judiciary as a safeguard against legislative overreach, reinforcing the protection of constitutional rights. The Anti-Federalists, however, remained concerned that such a strong federal structure would endanger individual liberties, arguing for the need for explicit protections in the form of a Bill of Rights.
Why did federalists agree to add the bill of rights to the constitution?
to gain the support of the Anti-Federalists to ensure slaves could not vote to gain the support of the Anti-Federalists
Did Abraham Baldwin support the great compromise?
Yes, Abraham Baldwin supported the Great Compromise during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. He played a crucial role in bridging the divide between the larger and smaller states by advocating for a bicameral legislature that included both proportional representation in the House and equal representation in the Senate. This compromise helped to ensure a balance of power and contributed to the eventual ratification of the U.S. Constitution.
Did John Dickinson like the three fifths compromise?
John Dickinson, a Founding Father from Pennsylvania, expressed concerns about the Three-Fifths Compromise during the Constitutional Convention. While he recognized the political necessity of the compromise to ensure Southern support for ratification, he was personally opposed to slavery and believed it was morally wrong. Ultimately, he sought a balance between representation and the ethical implications of counting enslaved individuals for political gain.
