I am pretty sure that is an assignment question, and you are very lazy.
Go research it yourself.
Denise Stamper has written: 'The development of the doctrine of proprietary estoppel'
Detrimental reliance (promissory estoppel), 181, 188 Cheeseman (2010) stated, "EQUITY: PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL The doctrine of promissory estoppel, or equitable estoppel, is another equitable exception to the strict application of the Statute of Frauds. The version of promissory estoppel in the Restatement (Second) of Contracts provides that if parties enter into an oral contract that should be in writing under the Statute of Frauds, the oral promise is enforceable against the promisor if three conditions are met: (1) The promise induces action or forbearance of action by another, (2) the reliance on the oral promise was foreseeable, and (3) injustice can be avoided only by enforcing the oral promise.Where this doctrine applies, the promisor is estopped ( prevented ) from raising the Statute of Frauds as a defense to the enforcement of the oral contract." (p.226)
ture
Also known as issue preclusion, collateral estoppel is a doctrine that prevents a person from re-litigating an issue once it has been ruled on. Collateral estoppel originated in civil law, but has been applied to federal criminal law.
Estoppel may be a matter of law; it may also be claimed because of a loss of money or value (equity) by either party. A party is estopped (prevented) because the law indicates that the action is unlawful or because one of the parties will suffer an unfair financial loss if the act is permitted.
Estoppel is a legal principle that prevents a person from arguing something contrary to a claim they previously made or accepted as true, especially if doing so would harm another party who relied on the original claim. It aims to uphold fairness and prevent inconsistency in legal proceedings. There are various forms of estoppel, including equitable estoppel and promissory estoppel, each addressing different scenarios where reliance on a statement or action is at stake. Essentially, estoppel serves to protect the integrity of legal agreements and representations.
To all men paying Child Support, What they DON'T want you to know... I created an Equity of Estoppel Document pertaining to Cease Child Support, presented it to DES Maricopa County Arizona. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.
Exceptions to collateral estoppel include when the party against whom the doctrine is being invoked did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the previous action, or when there is new evidence that was not available in the previous action. Additionally, collateral estoppel may not apply if the issue in question is of public importance and should be reexamined for public policy reasons.
Proprietary Estoppel is not dead. It has its usefulness and is still relevant today. Please see Taylor Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd [1984] QB 133. This case arises due to the restrictive nature of the requirements laid down in Willmott v Barber (1880). The word "unconscionability" is use in Taylor Fashions case to provide the defect/weakness that Willmott v Barber creates.
The mortgage co. has so many days required by law to respond to the request in writing to establish the pay-off amount of mortgage note with validation if they fail to do so they are in serious violation of statute and are at risk for fines an/or penalities by the state licencing board, etc.! If one party promises to excuse the other party from their duties, but then goes back on this promise in a unfair way, the court may allow this following the equitable doctrine of promissory estoppel, established in the case of Central London Property trust v High Trees House (1949).
Here is a basic definition of "estoppel." Estoppel is a legal doctrine that prevents a person from adopting a position, action, or attitude, asserting a fact or a right, or prevents one from denying a fact inconsistent with an earlier position if it would result in an injury to someone else. There are three types of estoppel and the question is not really specific enough to render a more exact answer.
Yeah it's estoppel, whether it be collateral estoppel or any other estoppel, it is estoppel, although estoppel and double jeopardy are synonymous. In civil matter, it's called "res judicata". That's civil double jeopardy. A case dismissed with prejudice or found that the defendant is liable will result in res judicata.