The Supreme Court of the United States requires (most) cases to exhaust all avenues of appeal before petitioning the Court for writ of certiorari (request for review).
This is true of all cases appealed from state courts, and most cases appealed from lower federal courts; however, under certain circumstances, the Supreme Court will hear cases on expedited appeal, bypassing the US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts. This is most likely to happen if the case involves a high-ranking government official or challenged legislation where Congress specified an expedited appeals process.
What are the remedies in a juvenile court system?
Legal remedies are typically monetary compensation or specific performance ordered by a court, while equitable remedies involve non-monetary solutions like injunctions or specific performance. Legal remedies focus on compensating the injured party, while equitable remedies aim to prevent unjust enrichment or enforce fairness. The choice of remedy can significantly impact the outcome of a court case, as it determines the type of relief granted to the parties involved.
False
Not unless it is later stipulated by the parties at the family court.
Generally, the last order to be entered is in force unless it has expired. In that case, the parties must bring a fresh motion before the court to request a new order.Generally, the last order to be entered is in force unless it has expired. In that case, the parties must bring a fresh motion before the court to request a new order.Generally, the last order to be entered is in force unless it has expired. In that case, the parties must bring a fresh motion before the court to request a new order.Generally, the last order to be entered is in force unless it has expired. In that case, the parties must bring a fresh motion before the court to request a new order.
Yes, a court can grant both legal remedies, such as monetary damages, and equitable remedies, such as injunctions or specific performance. Legal remedies aim to compensate for losses, while equitable remedies seek to address broader issues of fairness and justice.
NO. The Supreme Court can only review cases brought before it after the litigants exhaust their remedies in lower state or federal courts. State constitutions are governed by state law.
Equitable remedies were developed in England by the Court of Chancery (a court of equity) during the time of Henry VII. These judicial remedies continue to be granted today in certain cases.
If a judge is biased in a court case, it can undermine the fairness and impartiality of the legal process, potentially leading to an unjust outcome. It is important for judges to remain neutral and unbiased to ensure that all parties receive a fair trial. If bias is suspected, parties can raise objections and seek remedies such as recusal or appeal.
You can visit the court that has jurisdiction and look up the names of the parties, or one of the parties, in the case index.You can visit the court that has jurisdiction and look up the names of the parties, or one of the parties, in the case index.You can visit the court that has jurisdiction and look up the names of the parties, or one of the parties, in the case index.You can visit the court that has jurisdiction and look up the names of the parties, or one of the parties, in the case index.
Not unless it is a legally signed document that states that both parties are agreeing to follow through with the act of the " I o you"
Ask your question at the court. Courts have sanctions for parties who ignore summonses.Ask your question at the court. Courts have sanctions for parties who ignore summonses.Ask your question at the court. Courts have sanctions for parties who ignore summonses.Ask your question at the court. Courts have sanctions for parties who ignore summonses.