to try and prove the guiltyness of the defendent with evedence and or witnesses
Yes, it is possible to sue a prosecutor for misconduct or negligence in handling a case, but it can be challenging to prove and win such a lawsuit due to legal immunities that prosecutors often have.
Do not understand question. WHO says it no longer has PC? Probable Cause is WHAT the prosecutor is going to prove to the jury as the foundation for the arrest and charge.
Yes, there is evidence of attempted manslaughter in the case under investigation.
Yes, a victim can potentially sue a prosecutor for misconduct or negligence in handling their case, but it can be a complex legal process with specific requirements that must be met. Victims may need to prove that the prosecutor's actions directly caused harm or violated their rights in order to have a successful case. It is recommended to consult with a legal professional for guidance on pursuing such a lawsuit.
The difference between these two charges is the intent of the accused. For manslaughter, a prosecutor typically must only prove that the accused acted in a way that was reckless or negligent that resulted in the victim's death. For the other charge that cannot be typed here because apparently the system in its infinite wisdom accepts all kinds of adult, sexual and other questionable topics but thinks a formal legal term is "vulgar", a prosecutor must prove the accused killed the victim intentionally.
"Beyond a reasonable doubt" in a criminal case, "A preponderance of the evidence" in a civil case. The advocate of a case always has the burden of proof - the prosecutor in a criminal case, the plaintiff in a civil case.
Yes, a prosecutor can subpoena a phone as evidence in a criminal case.
The prosecutor's office starts assembling their case and witnesses with a veiw towards presenting a solid case to prove the defendant guilty. Likewise, the defense starts doing the same thing for the presentation of the defense case. If the defendant is out on bailbond release, it will likely continue.
A jury in a criminal case is comprised of twelve (12) or six (6) members and two (2) alternates. The two alternates are not informed of their alternate status until after the closing arguements have been completed by both the prosecutor, the defense and the prosecutor again. The prosecutor gets the final say because it is their job to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
In this case, the charges for attempted manslaughter would likely include the intent to cause serious harm to another person but falling short of causing their death.
No. Evidence is only presented if the prosecutor and defender need to argue the case. The evidence is only used to prove guilt or innocence.