It's a legal philosophy that holds that judges should apply laws, and in particular the Constitution, as they are written rather than trying to infer things that are not explicitly spelled out.
It's closely related to (Justice Scalia has called it a "degraded form of") textualism.
Strict construction takes a narrow view of laws, statutes, and the constitution. Broad construction takes a broad view of laws, statutes, and the constitution.
The draft law.
You might think that these strict construction safety rules are unnecessary, but lives have been lost performing this task.
Strict Construction- Philosophy of narrowly interpreting the Constitution; holds that the government can only do what the Constitution specifically allows.Added: And Liberal constructionism holds that the Constitution is an ever-evolvingdocument subject to new interpretation and meaning as society evolves and values change.
Close. It means applying the law (not just the constitution) exactly as written.
Legal philosophy of judicial interpretation.
'strict construction' is when democratic-republican parties make sure no one is using powers that the Constitution says you cannot. Democratic-republicans are for a stronger State government.
A weak central government. a confederation, and individual rights.
In which case? There have been numerous cases where the liberal construction has prevailed and numerous cases where the strict construction was followed.
It's your interpretation of the constitution. The philosophy that allows narrow constitutional interpretation is called strict construction and the philosophy of broad constitutional interpretation is called loose construction. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison favored the strict constructions, and Alexander Hamilton favored the loose construction.
Loose construction-means that the federal government can take reasonable actions that the constitution does not specifically forbidStrict construction- people who favor strict constitution think that that federal government should do only what the constitution specifically says it can do The Loose Construction Theory is when federalists interpret the Constitution into things that are in favor of a stronger national government. There are limitations involved.
No that is false. It is an example of loose construction.