While everyone is supposed to get a speedy trial, justice sometimes moves slowly, and someone who has been arrested may end up spending time in jail awaiting their trial date. But once they have their trial, the court may decide that the time the person was already in jail is enough. This sometimes happens with relatively minor crimes. In such a situation, even though the person has been found guilty, the judge may sentence the defendant to "time served"-- in other words, the time the person spent in jail is long enough, and no additional jail time will be given.
If the summons is not served, it will be returned to the court. The only time a summons is not served is if you are not home, or they have a wrong address for you.
If a summons was served in this case, it would be a smart idea to respond to it. You can ask your question in court at that time.
There is no set time frame for the amount of time a summons must be served before a set court date. Each court; criminal, small claims, family has its own set of rules.
It means the court that issued the writ requires that it be served and the results of the service retunred to the court.
It means "Credit for time served". For instance, if the person in jail receives a 50 day jail sentence, and he's already served 30, he would get credit for those 30 days.
It means "Credit for time served". For instance, if the person in jail receives a 50 day jail sentence, and he's already served 30, he would get credit for those 30 days.
it is served at the back of the court, behind the line(;
Certainly the individual served time FOR the military; but didn't serve IN the military.
If you mean can you be held in contempt for not appearing on the date the subpoena said you had to appear on, the answer is no, you cannot be held in contempt of court. The subpoena is binding on you only if it is duly served upon you according to applicable law.
Probably
Served with WHAT? A subpoena? It depends on WHAT you got "served" with. How is the subpoena worded? If it states to appear for trial, then, yes, it will be a trial. If it's for a hearing, then it will be for a hearing. READ IT!
Yes they can..... If the court makes that determination. Each juridiction and court has the discretion to do this or not. It is not a set in stone rule. It is on a case by case basis.