In criminal court you have two sides advocating for their particular party. The prosecutor arguing for the state, and the defense arguing for the defendant. They are adversaries. Thus, an adversarial system, not a cooperative system.
Question makes no sense and actually answers itself. There is (1) the Prosecution and (2) the Defense. Period.
The Australian justice system is an adversarial system of justice where there are essentially two parties that face each other in court proceedings. So the answer of your question could best be described as an Adversarial Trial.
Japan has an independent judicial system patterned on the American model, with trial courts at the local level, several intermediate appellate courts, and a Supreme Court.
The Adversarial System is the justice system that is used in countries like Australia, Britain, and America. It relies on a contest between each of the advocates (speaker) representing his or her party's positions and involves an impartial person or group of people, usually a judge or jury, who try to determine the truth of the case. The adversarial system is normally used in common law countries. An exception, for instance in the US, may be made for minor violations, such as traffic offences.. The adversarial system is the two-sided structure where criminal trial courts operate and put the prosecution against the defence. The case is won when either party has been able to convince the judge and jury that their view is correct.
Because in the federal court system, District Courts are the lowest level of courts of original jurisdiction. Therefore, Constitutionally, defendants appearing for trial before District Courts are entitled to a trial by jury.
Although some New York jurisdictions may have additional trial courts, the three main trial courts in the New York state court system are Supreme Courts, Family Courts, and Surrogate's Courts. These three types of courts are located in every county. For more information on New York courts, visit the New York Courts Directory related link.
The types of courts in the Philippines include the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, Sandiganbayan (anti-graft court), Court of Tax Appeals, and lower courts such as Regional Trial Courts, Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts, and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts. These courts have different jurisdictions and functions in the Philippine judicial system.
The two classications of courts are civil courts and criminal courts. Governmental divisions include federal, state, county, and municipal courts. A further division of federal and state courts is into trial courts and appeals courts.
US District Courts are the trial courts of general jurisdiction in the federal court system.
In the Illinois state court system, the trial courts are called Circuit Courts and are the lowest courts. Trial court decisions may be appealed to appeals courts within the state court system. For more information on the Illinois court system, see the Illinois Court Directory related link.
b. district courts
Courts that have the authority to be the first courts in which most federal cases are heard are known as district courts. These are the trial courts of the federal judiciary system and are responsible for hearing both civil and criminal cases.