If a contract contradicts itself, it can lead to confusion regarding the parties' intentions and obligations. Courts typically interpret ambiguous or contradictory clauses in favor of the party that did not draft the contract, often using the principle of contra proferentem. Additionally, the contract may be considered voidable or unenforceable if the contradictions are material and affect the agreement's core purpose. Ultimately, resolving such contradictions may require negotiation between the parties or intervention by a court.
Figure of speech
A statement that contradicts itself, therefore having no meaning
An oxymoron is a type of figurative language that contradicts itself by combining two seemingly contradictory or opposing words to create a new expression with a unique meaning, such as "jumbo shrimp" or "bittersweet."
The parol evidence rule has nothing to do with the parole system. The parol evidence rule has to do with contract law. It prevents a person who is a party to a written contract from arguing that external evidence contradicts the words of the contract.
Because time travel is a complicated procedure that always contradicts itself.
No, the question contradicts itself. If it is repeating then it cannot be terminating and if it is terminating then it cannot be repeating!
The question contradicts itself. If there are 24 hours of daylight evereyday then there cannot be any hours - not even one - of darkness. Not in June, nbut ever!The question contradicts itself. If there are 24 hours of daylight evereyday then there cannot be any hours - not even one - of darkness. Not in June, nbut ever!The question contradicts itself. If there are 24 hours of daylight evereyday then there cannot be any hours - not even one - of darkness. Not in June, nbut ever!The question contradicts itself. If there are 24 hours of daylight evereyday then there cannot be any hours - not even one - of darkness. Not in June, nbut ever!
No, the question contradicts itself. If it is repeating then it cannot be terminating and if it is terminating then it cannot be repeating!
No, the question contradicts itself. If it is repeating then it cannot be terminating and if it is terminating then it cannot be repeating!
The contract is void.
To shrink, draw into itself, make itself smaller.
That contract will be withdrawn and you will probably be charged.