See this cite: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_length_of_time_a_state_can_pursue_extradition_procedures_if_the_accused_is_fighting_the_extradition_and_would_the_accused_be_eligible_for_bail
Absolutely. However the actual reason for extradition would be beause you jumped bail as opposed to the nature of the original charges. Allso, as with warrants, once you leave the state it becomes a federal crime.
Yes, Dowry is in fact ILLEGAL in India!
yes
If the charge was MANUFACTURING AND DELIVERING, it is quite likely that you will be extradited.
Questions to the case officer in charge would illuminate your path.
All US states and territories honor each other's requests for extradition - there are no 'safe-haven' states - it is impossible to state with certainty whether a particular state will choose to extradite you or not, there are simply too many variables. It may depend on the offense and the seriousness of it and/or how badly they want you returned - most states WILLextradite for felony offenses.
Yes, if the charge is serious enough to justify the cost of the extradition.
The country which does the extradition it's the deciding factor. Countries are not obligated from a legal perspective to extradite anyone within its borders, since that would be a huge blow to the concept of sovereignty.
In Pennsylvania, in order to fight extradition to another state, the defendant can contest the validity of the charge against him and petition the court for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. The Uniform Criminal Extradition Act provides some uniformity and, generally, the same legal requirements that are required for requests from other participating states apply to Pennsylvania requests as well.
Yes, it is possible for Illinois to extradite someone from Mississippi for a felony charge, such as possession of weed with intent. Extradition typically depends on the seriousness of the offense and whether there is a valid arrest warrant issued by the state seeking extradition. However, the specific circumstances of the case and the extradition laws in Illinois and Mississippi will ultimately determine if extradition will occur.
If the person being held does not "waive" extradition it will take longer because of the detaining state having to hold an extradition hearing to satisfy their law that the extradition is being done 'legally.' There ARE legal pprocedures that must be followed and adhered to (i.e.- filing of papers - court hearing - arranging transportation, etc, etc) A 'reasonable' length of time by the jurisdiction issuing the warrant is expected. However it will seldom be as short as 24 hours, or even a week, but it should not take up to months either. If the delay seems unreasonably long a writ demanding action, or release can be filed with the detaining jurisdiction. If the detainee 'waives' extradition the process proceeds more quickly.
It depends upon the charge, and upon legal standards being satisfactorily met. For Pennsylvania tends to focus on extradition requests in the immediately surrounding states. But the Commonwealth also tends to respect, and cooperate with, the other 49 states of the United States of America in extradition requests. For extradition tends to be requested for the serious, felony charges. And Pennsylvania cooperates when the U.S. government becomes involved once the role of another country is identified. For involvement of another country always makes extradition a federal concern.