Extradition.
Since you fled prosecution in the first place, and had to be returned via an interstate warrrant, it is HIGHLY unlikely.
The question itself defines the word and the process - it is an example of inter-governmental cooperation. interstate coorperation!!!!!!1
Extradition, or extraditing depends on if the person has been taken to the other state or not.
False, Lady Macbeth goes to return the daggers.
The annual Moose Festival held in Colebrook, New Hampshire, Canaan, Vermont, and Pittsburg, New Hampshire, was established in 1990. It was canceled in 1997 following the Drega shootings, but returned as normal the next year.
If you have defaulted on your loan and not returned the vehicle, then you have basically committed a theft.
Well, after Lenin was returned to Russia, he kinda shook things up a bit. He led the Bolshevik Revolution, overthrew the Provisional Government, and established the Soviet Union. So yeah, he basically changed the course of Russian history like a boss.
It was where he was born. He returned there to take revenge on those that did not worship him there and that did not believe his mother had been impregnated by Zeus.
Being returned to the state where a crime was committed is "extradition" .
It was weird at first, he was unsure about her because she was a vampire but they adjusted and returned to their best friend relationship without him being in love with her, because he imprinted on her daughter.
In Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2 of the US Constitution, the interstate rendition of fugitives was established. Beginning in 1793, other laws were enacted to support this clause. Generally, it states that the executive authority of a state may order that an indicted suspect or fugitive be returned to face charges in that state, in the jurisdiction in which a crime was committed. Conflicts with this can occur where more than one state has a legitimate claim on the individual involved. The precedent to blocking extradition in Kentucky v. Dennison (based on slavery, 1861) was reversed by the US Supreme Court in Puerto Rico v. Branstad in 1987.
It is certainly possible to love someone who does not love you, but that is an unsatisfying relationship. Mutual love is much more enjoyable.