0
What else can I help you with?
Which defense is sometimes nicknamed as the lesser of two evils?
mistake or ignorance of fact or law
What is the difference between the humanitarian law and international law?
the difference is this is small and that is big
What is the difference between newton's first law and law of inertia?
There is no difference. They are the same.
Which of the following is not an element of fraud a. Scienter b. Misrepresentation of a material fact c. Justifiable reliance by the innocent party d. Ignorance of the law?
d. ignorance of the law d. ignorance of the law
What difference between sin and mistake?
A Sin Is Somthing That You Do On A Purpose Issue, A Mistake Is Like: You Fall On Something, Trip, Scratch, (Mistake) That Does Not Matter At All. And In contract law, a mistake is an erroneous belief, at contracting, that certain facts are true. It can be argued as a defence, and if raised successfully can lead to the agreement in question being found void ab initio or voidable, or alternatively an equitable remedy may be provided by the courts. Common law has identified three different types of mistake in contract: the 'unilateral mistake', the 'mutual mistake' and the 'common mistake'. It is important to note the distinction between the 'common mistake' and the 'mutual mistake'.Mistake can be- (1)Mistake of Law (2)Mistake of FactMistake of law: when a party enters into a contract, without the knowledge of the law in the country, the contract is affected by such mistakes but it is not void. A contract is not voidable because it was caused by a mistake as to any law in force in India. The reason here is that ignorance of law is not an excuse at all. However if a party is induced to enter into a contract by the mistake of law then such a contract is not valid. Illustration A and B make a contract grounded on the erroneous belief that a particular debt is barred by the Indian law of Limitation; the contract is not voidable.Mistake of Fact: Where both the parties into an agreement are under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is void. Explanation: An erroneous opinion as to the value of the thing which forms the subject-matter of the agreement is not to be deemed a mistake as to a matter of fact.Illustration: (1) A agrees to buy a certain horse from B. It turns out that the horse was dead at the time of bargain, through neither party was aware of the fact. The agreement is void. (2) A, being entitled to an estate for the life to B, agrees to sell it to C. B was dead at the time of an agreement, but both the parties were ignorant of the fact. The agreement is void.
What is the difference between customary law and indigenous law?
None.
What role does ignorance play in the concept that "ignorance is 9/10 of the law"?
The concept that "ignorance is 9/10 of the law" suggests that people who are unaware of the law may not be held accountable for breaking it. Ignorance can play a significant role in this concept as it implies that lack of knowledge about the law can sometimes serve as a defense or excuse for illegal actions.
Difference between public law and private law in India?
law and rules
What is the difference between law of return to variable proportion and law or return to scale?
There is a big difference between both the laws.The basi difference between them is that i dont know 1st but i know the 2nd one
What is the difference between colonial law English law?
colonial law is not law are rules of english law
What is the difference between governing and ruling law?
?
If a citizen claims ignorance of the law is he responsible for his crime?
Yes, he is still responsible for his crime. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. It is your duty as a citizen to know, understand, and obey the law. This is why laws are written.
