answersLogoWhite

0

The principle that you may do as you wish so long as it does not infringe upon the ability of others to do the same.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What consequences do you face if you harm my daughter, considering the principle of "what you do to my daughter, I do to you"?

If you harm someone's daughter, you may face consequences where the same harm is done to you, based on the principle of reciprocity.


What are examples of the harm principle?

Examples of the harm principle include restrictions on free speech when it incites violence, laws against drunk driving to prevent harm to others, and regulations on environmental pollution to protect public health. The harm principle suggests that actions should only be restricted if they cause harm to others.


What is harm principle?

The principle that you may do what you want so long as it does not harm any one else. What constitutes 'any one' and 'harm' is purposely unspecified and open to interpretation under Mill's original proposition.


How does the harm principle differ from paternalism?

According to the harm principle, we are only justified in interfering with a person's liberty if that person uses her liberty to harm others. This rules out paternalism, or interfering with a person's liberty for that person's own sake. The two differ because the former is a principle that rejects the latter.


An ethical principle that requires caregivers to avoid causing patients harm?

nonmaleficence


Nomaleficence is an ethical principle that is based on this phase?

never knowingly do harm to patients. protection of patients


Which ethical principle is closely associated with the maxim primum non nocere - first do no harm?

The ethical principle closely associated with the maxim "primum non nocere" (first do no harm) is nonmaleficence. Nonmaleficence emphasizes the obligation of healthcare providers to avoid causing harm to patients, whether through action or inaction. This principle underlies many medical decisions and practices, ensuring that patient safety and well-being are prioritized in all aspects of care.


What was john Stuart mills theory?

He wrote about the Greatest Happiness Principle and the Harm Principle. Greatest Happiness means making moral decisions so that the greatest amount of pleasure is given to the greatest amount of people. The Harm Principle is a theory that people should be able to do whatever they want as long as it does not infringe upon other people's ability to so the same.


A moral principle that one should refrain from harming other?

The principle of nonmaleficence, also known as "do no harm," is a moral guideline that emphasizes the importance of avoiding causing harm or injury to others. It is commonly associated with medical ethics and is a fundamental principle in various ethical frameworks and professions. Practicing nonmaleficence involves acting in ways that prioritize the well-being and safety of individuals.


What is the precautionary principle?

The precautionary principle is a guideline for decision making. Some human-induced changes can lead to large or even catastrophic consequences, so those responsible for the change must prove that it causes no harm before proceeding. Objectors do not have to prove that there will be harm. This is a reverse of historical practices where those opposing the change had to prove its harmful effects to prevent the change from going ahead.


What does harm hatch harm catch mean?

"Harm hatch, harm catch" is a phrase that suggests the idea of consequences for one's actions, particularly in the context of causing harm. It implies that if someone inflicts harm on others, they are likely to face repercussions or "catch" harm themselves, whether directly or indirectly. This concept often underscores the moral principle that actions have consequences, promoting accountability and empathy in interpersonal relationships.


What is an eye for an eye justice?

This concept originated in the Code of Hamumurabi; a Babylonian (or ancient Iraq) law system. The concept suggests that it is perfectly morally justified to harm those who harm you physically with the equivalent amount of physical harm in return.