Second only to abortion, capital punishment is hotly debated. And each side has very good points. Many people feel that to take another's life, no matter the reason, is a sin against God and humanity. It is true that the death penalty is hardly ever a deterrent to crime. The 'two wrongs don't make a right' attitude is their biggest argument.
On the other hand, some people think that, depending on the crime and the individuals involved, some crimes are so horrible that death is the only justice. Also, some types of crimes and the people that commit them, cannot be rehabilitated and will continue to be a danger to other people, either in or out of prison. And this is a good point. Some criminals can't be 'fixed'.
Charles Manson prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi feels that justice was not served by letting Manson live when he originally received the death penalty. People like Manson do very well in a very structured environment like prison. He gets along fine and it was really not a punishment at all to send him to prison.
There will never be an easy answer and everybody has their own viewpoint on this subject. It could be that both sides are a little wrong and a little right.
The death penalty is a very divisive topic of conversation.
The death penalty for very serious crimes is cruel and unusual.
The death penalty is the most controversial penal practice in the modern world because it seems so out of place in a civilized society. However, others believe that it is necessary in cases of heinous crimes.
third degree burn
The death penalty is controversial, so some people would see it as a violation of the right to life while others would not see it that way.
Yes No, it should not. An eye for an eye. You deserve the same fate you gave your victim. Of course there should be major, flawless laws for the death penalty, and of course understandable reasons for being put under the death penalty. For example, if you steal a car, the death penalty is just too harsh of a punishment. But if you murder someone, then the death penalty is an excellent form of punishment; again, an eye for an eye.
The death penalty is a form of punishment where a convicted criminal is sentenced to death by the state for the crimes they have committed. It is a highly debated and controversial issue with arguments both for and against its use, citing moral, ethical, and practical concerns. The death penalty remains legal in some countries and states while others have abolished it due to concerns about its application, effectiveness, and impact on society.
Economy, immigration, 2d Amendment, abortion, death penalty (not in that order)
Some people believe that the death penalty should be stopped. This is a give or take issue. An issue with having the death penalty, is being killed when you haven't actually done the crime, which in this day and age, dosen't happen a lot, but when it does is trauma and a name for that person. The death penalty would be good, for people that have done extreme crimes, such as murder, rapings and other misfits of judgements, but also for those who have been wrongly accused this could be a problem.
The death penalty has been applied to a wide range of individuals throughout history, including convicted murderers, terrorists, and those guilty of treason or espionage. Notable cases include high-profile criminals like Ted Bundy and Timothy McVeigh, as well as political figures such as former dictators. The methods and justifications for execution have varied by culture and legal system, reflecting societal attitudes towards crime and punishment. Today, the death penalty remains a controversial issue, with ongoing debates about its morality, effectiveness, and potential for wrongful convictions.
For. If most of the citizens in Texas did not want the death penalty, there would be no death penalty.
No,the state of Missouri does not have the death penalty.