No, but court orders, and judicial rulings are valid from stat-to-state.
an out-of-court settlement
John G. Collier has written: 'The settlement of disputes in international law' -- subject(s): Arbitration and award, Dispute resolution (Law), Pacific settlement of international disputes 'Judicial control of government action' -- subject(s): Judicial review of administrative acts
In the Philippines you need a Deed of Extra Judicial settlement
The greatest advance in the judicial settlement of international disputes was marked by the establishment of the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) in 1922, followed by its successor, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 1945. These institutions provided a formalized and institutional framework for states to resolve disputes peacefully through legal means, enhancing the rule of law in international relations. Their establishment represented a significant shift towards judicial methods of conflict resolution, promoting diplomacy and dialogue over war. Additionally, these courts have contributed to the development of international law and the principle of accountability among nations.
A judicial preceding can be a "judicial hearing" or a trial.
judicial branch
No governors have judicial power. That power rests with the judicial branch.
No governors have judicial power. That power rests with the judicial branch.
Jacqueline D. Krikorian has written: 'Judicial review beyond state borders? The impact of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism on legislative and policy arrangements in Canada and the United States'
Unless I am missing the point of the question, I'm not understanding what the questioner is driving at. Enforcement of Judicial rulings by the authorities, is an EXTENSION of Judicial power NOT a a restriction of it.
leads the judicial branch