A summary conviction is a legal term used in criminal law to describe a type of offense that is considered less serious than indictable offenses. These crimes typically carry lighter penalties, such as fines or short-term imprisonment, and are usually tried in a lower court without a jury. Summary convictions often involve offenses like petty theft or minor assaults. The process is generally quicker and less formal than that of more serious charges.
The Crown may decide to proceed by summary conviction rather than by indictment for several reasons, including the nature of the offense being less serious, which allows for a quicker resolution and lower penalties. Summary conviction typically involves fewer legal complexities and reduced court resources, making it more efficient for both the prosecution and the judicial system. Additionally, the decision may be influenced by the strength of the evidence, the likelihood of a conviction, or the defendant's criminal history. Ultimately, it reflects a strategic choice to balance justice with efficiency.
In Canada, a hybrid offence is considered an indictable offence. For instance, there is no obligation to have your fingerprint taken if you are charge with a summary offence, but your fingerprint will be taken if your are charge with an hybrid offence, even if the prosecutor opted for summary conviction.
The opposite of a conviction is a non-conviction. (See non-conviction)
In Canada, the statute of limitations for assault varies depending on whether it is considered a summary conviction or an indictable offense. For summary conviction offenses, the limitation period is generally six months from the date of the incident. For indictable offenses, there is no statute of limitations, allowing prosecution to occur at any time. However, specific circumstances may affect these time frames, so it's essential to consult legal resources or professionals for particular cases.
Louis Paul Shannon has written: 'Motor vehicle offences and the summary conviction court' -- subject(s): Automobiles, Law and legislation, Traffic regulations
she was in conviction
Alan D. Gold has written: 'Annual Review of Criminal Law 1986' 'Defending Drinking and Driving Cases 2001' 'Summary Conviction Appeals - Ontario'
It may be considered a terrorist conviction.
She has a conviction of passing the examination. This is a sentence containing the word conviction.
Depends. Conviction for WHAT?
The strength of his conviction was carried in the vigor of his voice. An accusation is not the same as a conviction.
The duration of The Conviction is 1.53 hours.