0
What else can I help you with?
How were the 18th-century French revolutionaries inspired by the Enlightenment?
Answer this question… Jean-Jacques Rousseau's writings inspired them to view practices like inherited privilege and absolute monarchy as irrational.
Presidential claims to the executive privilege are based on what?
With executive privilege, the president is allowed to overstep congressional authority, and not answer to Congress's efforts to question his or her actions. With the series of checks and balances that are established in the Constitution, this particular privilege is puzzling. Some believe that executive privilege is a fallacy, and that congressional approval is absolute.
Is executive privilege and absolute power?
It is more of a privilege than an absolute power because of the checks and balances in the government. (Checks and balances is were different branches of the government [executive, judicial, legislative] have to go through each other to get things done within the government) -Sprat
Should the absolute privilege for communications made in judicial or other official proceedings apply to statements made when a citizen contacts police to report suspected criminal activity?
Should the absolute privilege for communications made in judicial or other official proceedings apply to statements made when a citizen contacts the police to report suspected criminal activity? Why or Why not?
Did the court hold that there are no circumstances under which executive privilege might be asserted?
No, the court did not hold that there are no circumstances under which executive privilege might be asserted. Instead, it acknowledged that executive privilege can exist but emphasized that it is not absolute and must be balanced against the need for disclosure in certain situations. The court's ruling highlighted the importance of judicial oversight in determining the applicability of executive privilege in specific cases.
How were the 18th-century French revolutionaries inspired by the?
Jean-Jacques Rousseau's writings inspired them to view practices like inherited privilege and absolute monarchy as irrational.
What was the dissenting opinion on us vs Nixon?
There were no dissenting opinions because the case ruled against Nixon 8-0. The concurring opinion was a collective agreement between all justices in that the tapes held criminal conduct between the President and his men as well as that Nixon's claim to absolute executive privilege was wrong. Executive privilege is a right to the president; however, it is not absolute and can be checked by the Congress or Supreme Court.
What did the Supreme Court rule that executive privilege is only extended when connected to national security?
The Supreme Court ruled that executive privilege, which allows the president to withhold information from other branches of government, is primarily justified when it concerns national security matters. This ruling emphasizes that while the executive branch has a degree of confidentiality, such privilege is not absolute and must be balanced against the needs of justice and transparency. The Court established that claims of executive privilege must be rooted in legitimate concerns for national security to be upheld.
Why do you think Roman citizens were not crucified?
Freedom from crucifixion was a privilege of Roman citizenship.Freedom from crucifixion was a privilege of Roman citizenship.Freedom from crucifixion was a privilege of Roman citizenship.Freedom from crucifixion was a privilege of Roman citizenship.Freedom from crucifixion was a privilege of Roman citizenship.Freedom from crucifixion was a privilege of Roman citizenship.Freedom from crucifixion was a privilege of Roman citizenship.Freedom from crucifixion was a privilege of Roman citizenship.Freedom from crucifixion was a privilege of Roman citizenship.
Waive attorney client privilege?
Absolutley. It is important to keep in mind that the privilege belongs to the client, not the attorney. Privilege often gets waived unintentionally by letting another person in on the communication with the attorney. For example, before I was a lawyer I was talking to my lawyer about getting divorced. I brought a friend with me and she was present during the conference. By having her present, I had waived privilege as to those communications with my lawyer. But remember that the privilege can be quite absolute if not waived. Anytime someone comes to a lawyer for legal advice, even if no hiring of the lawyer results, the communication is privileged forever, even after the death of the person who sought the advice. Absolutley. It is important to keep in mind that the privilege belongs to the client, not the attorney. Privilege often gets waived unintentionally by letting another person in on the communication with the attorney. For example, before I was a lawyer I was talking to my lawyer about getting divorced. I brought a friend with me and she was present during the conference. By having her present, I had waived privilege as to those communications with my lawyer. But remember that the privilege can be quite absolute if not waived. Anytime someone comes to a lawyer for legal advice, even if no hiring of the lawyer results, the communication is privileged forever, even after the death of the person who sought the advice. Absolutley. It is important to keep in mind that the privilege belongs to the client, not the attorney. Privilege often gets waived unintentionally by letting another person in on the communication with the attorney. For example, before I was a lawyer I was talking to my lawyer about getting divorced. I brought a friend with me and she was present during the conference. By having her present, I had waived privilege as to those communications with my lawyer. But remember that the privilege can be quite absolute if not waived. Anytime someone comes to a lawyer for legal advice, even if no hiring of the lawyer results, the communication is privileged forever, even after the death of the person who sought the advice.
Is teenage driving a privilege or a right?
It's a privilege. Nobody has the absolute right to drive a vehicle. They have to prove they're intelligent enough to understand road signs, competent enough to operate the vehicle safely - and responsible for their own actions if something goes wrong. They have to be mature enough to use the vehicle sensibly, with due regard to other road users and pedestrians.
Is a drivers license a right or a privilege?
Privilege
