0
What else can I help you with?
What is fortas opinion about the notion that free speech can cause controversy?
That the United States is the kind of society in which disagreement is a strength
What is Fortas's opinion about that free speech can cause controversy?
That the United States is the kind of society in which disagreement is a strength
What is forta's opinion about notion that free speech can cause controversy?
That the United States is the kind of society in which disagreement is a strength
How did justice fortas concept of pure speech extend first amendment free speech rights?
How did Justice Fortas's concept of "pure speech" extend First Amendment free speech rights?
How does Fortas defend majority opinion that free speech in school is constitutional protected?
Fortas argues that free speech is a fundamental right that extends into schools, emphasizing that students do not lose their First Amendment rights at the schoolhouse gate. He contends that free expression is essential for the democratic process and educational development, allowing students to engage in discourse and critical thinking. Fortas highlights the importance of protecting diverse viewpoints to foster a healthy learning environment, asserting that schools should promote, rather than suppress, free speech.
What part of speech is notion?
The word notion is a singular noun. The plural would be notions.
What part of speech is the word opinion?
Opinion is a noun
Is the checker speech fact or opinion?
The statement "the checker speech is powerful and moving" is an opinion because it reflects a personal judgment about the speech's impact on someone.
What are two of Justice Fortas's basic reasons for ruling in favor of the students?
Justice Fortas ruled in favor of the students in Tinker v. Des Moines because he believed that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate" and that the students' armbands did not cause a substantial disruption to the school environment.
How does Fortas defend the majority decision that free speech in school is constitutionally protected?
By citing a similar case, West Virginia v. Barnette, in which the Court decided that students are not required to salute the flag
How does Fortas defend the majority decision that free-speech in school is constitutionally protected?
Fortas defend the majority opinion that free speech in school is constitutionally protected by saying that such an expression isn't disruptive to ...
How does Justice Fortas defend and explain his decision in the majority opinion for Tinker v. Des Moines How strong is his reasoning What concerns do you have about his argument?
In the majority opinion for Tinker v. Des Moines, Justice Fortas defends the decision by emphasizing the First Amendment rights of students, arguing that they do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." He reasons that the students' silent protest did not disrupt the educational process and thus should be protected. While his reasoning is robust in advocating for civil liberties, one concern is the potential for conflicts between student expression and school authority, which could lead to challenges in maintaining an orderly educational environment.
