Legal standards and moral principles often diverge, as laws are established by societal consensus and can vary significantly across cultures and contexts. What is legally permissible may not align with ethical beliefs or moral values, which are often grounded in personal, cultural, or philosophical frameworks. For instance, certain practices may be legal but considered immoral by many, reflecting the complex relationship between law and morality. Ultimately, while legality provides a framework for acceptable behavior, morality addresses deeper questions of right and wrong.
Obligation as a juridical necessity refers to a legal duty that requires an individual or entity to act or refrain from acting in a certain way. This necessity is grounded in law, meaning that failure to fulfill the obligation can result in legal consequences, such as penalties or the enforcement of rights. Essentially, it underscores the binding nature of obligations within the legal framework, distinguishing them from mere moral or social duties.
Necessity refers to something that is indispensable or required for a certain outcome, while obligation refers to a duty or responsibility to do something as a result of a moral, legal, or social contract. Necessity implies there is no other choice, whereas obligation suggests a sense of duty or commitment.
No, it is not legal to murder someone for cannibalism, even out of necessity. The law does not recognize necessity as a valid defense for committing murder. Taking another person's life is a crime, and legal systems prioritize the value of human life regardless of the circumstances. Cannibalism, coupled with murder, would lead to severe legal consequences.
No moral and legal permissibility are not the same. Moral permissibility is what is morally allowed and legal permissibility is what is legally allowed. An act can be morally permissible but can also be against the law.
Legal norms and moral norms can coexist and sometimes overlap, but they are not always the same. Legal norms are enforced by the legal system, whereas moral norms are based on individual or societal beliefs about right and wrong. In some cases, legal norms may reflect moral norms, but in other cases, they may diverge.
He thought that it was a moral issue
uh i think the moral lesson is it is best to prepare for the days of necessity
Kant addressed moral issues such as the importance of acting out of duty rather than inclination, the concept of moral duty as a categorical imperative, the necessity of treating individuals as ends in themselves, and the idea that moral actions should be universalizable.
Economic necessity
The abstract noun for "oblige" is "obligation." It refers to the state of being bound or compelled to do something, often due to a sense of duty or responsibility. An obligation can arise from legal, moral, or social requirements, highlighting the necessity of fulfilling certain duties or commitments.
The difference between legal rules and moral rules has to do with laws and how we behave regarding a moral code. Legal rules are based on laws that are set forth for us to follow. Moral rules have to do with a person's ethics. For example, it is not illegal to keep money that is found, but a person of high morals might try to return the money to the proper owner.
A main legal, or moral requirement