"No Act of Parliament can be unconstitutional, for the law of the land knows not the word or the idea."
british constitution differ from the US Constitution is that they dont have rule
There is no British Constitution, so it cannot be amended.
The British constitution is 'unwritten'. It is a collection of laws, conventions and case law. There is no codified constitution as there is for example, in the USA.
An uncodified constitution has a evolutionary nature.
it is supremeit is flexibleit is unitarysovereigntyit is uncodified constitution
The British constitution is an unwritten constitution, meaning that it does not exist in a single document or a set number of articles. It is composed of various laws, statutes, court decisions, and conventions that have evolved over time. Therefore, there is no specific number of articles in the British constitution.
Depends on what you mean by a "true constitution". The British don't have a codified, written document that they identify as their constitution. It consists of a number of different laws and precedents relied upon by Parliament.
There is no "British constitution" in the sense of the American one where a group of people sat down and wrote it. The British constitution is a collection of documents from the Magna Carta to the EU's Declaration of Human Rights. The constitution has evolved from 1215, the signing of the Magna Carta.
The Canadian Constitution was written by many members of the Canadian Parliament. It was called the British North America Act of 1967.
quasi fedral
The British Constitution is uncodified, not written down. It is entrenched in the laws of the nation. There is no single document with the constitutional laws written down.
Unwritten