answersLogoWhite

0

An objection to relevance is a legal challenge during a trial or hearing, asserting that certain evidence or testimony is not pertinent to the case at hand and should not be considered by the judge or jury. This objection aims to prevent the introduction of information that does not directly relate to the issues being litigated, thereby maintaining the focus and efficiency of the proceedings. If upheld, the objection can lead to the exclusion of the irrelevant evidence, protecting the fairness of the trial.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

12h ago

What else can I help you with?