One argument that people had against the patriot act was loyalists thought they should remain loyal to the king because they didn't want to get their family in trouble or get killed in rebellion actions that the patriots were doing. if its wrong don't judge in im 5th grade.
it violated the civil liberties of u.s citizens.
some people think that animals have rights to but others consider them less important than humans
It is possible that you may die.
Many people who served in the war were too young to vote.
There are none.
Religious. They said it was a sin against humanity.
look for it in the book :D
Some arguments for censorship are that some things are so disturbing or such a bad influence on people that they should be censored. Some arguments against censorship are that the people making the decisions are deciding what's right for everybody based on their own personal feelings, and also that people have a right to know about the things that affect or interest them.
Actually, opinions on this vary. But the tendency, nowadays, is that a majority of people think that the death penalty is uncivilized. Some arguments against the death penalty is that it is used disproportionately against ethnic minorities (for example, black people in the United States), and that it is irreversible (and there have been many cases where people executed, or people who were planned to be executed, turned out to be innocent). For further arguments, both for and against the death penalty, I suggest you consult the Wikipedia article on "Death penalty".
Some people argue that developers should not be involved in testing their own code but all testing should be done by a separate team. Give arguments for and against.
One proverb that cautions against arguing with fools is "Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." Another one is "Arguing with a fool proves there are two." These proverbs suggest that it is unwise to engage in arguments with foolish or irrational people as it is often futile and can be detrimental.
Some arguments against protecting endangered species include the belief that resources should be focused on more imminent human needs, such as poverty alleviation or healthcare. Some individuals also argue that extinction is a natural process that has occurred throughout Earth's history. Additionally, there are concerns about the economic impacts of protecting endangered species, such as restrictions on land use for agriculture or development.