The Chinese constitution, officially known as the Constitution of the People's Republic of China, was adopted in 1982 and serves as the fundamental law of the country. It outlines the structure of the state, the rights and duties of citizens, and the principles of governance. While it establishes a framework for political and civil rights, in practice, the Communist Party of China maintains significant control over political life, often limiting the effective realization of these rights. The constitution has undergone several amendments, reflecting changes in policy and governance.
There are several salient features of the Chinese constitution. Some of these include a written document, flexible constitution, and a unitary system.
Chinese
your mom pd on it and then sold it for fifty bucks
The Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC). It was the highest legislative body of the PRC from 1949 to 1954.
The Chinese constitution accepts that China is a dictatorship. Article 1 of the 1982 Constitution states:"The People's Republic of China is a socialist state under the people's democratic dictatorship led by the working class and based on the alliance of workers and peasants."The word "dictatorship" features eight times in total throughout the constitution. The full text of the constitution is available in English at http://english.people.com.cn/constitution/constitution.htmlThe Chinese government can also been seen as meeting the modern description of a dictatorship through its actions. A system of dictatorship can refer to a ruling system which is absolute and unrestricted by law. The Chinese government is not fettered in its actions by a libertarian constitution in the same way that the governments of the USA and most western liberal democracies are.The constitution of China does not have any legal force against the Chinese government. Unlike western liberal democracies such as the USA, individuals in China do not have a forum, such as a court, in which to assert their constitutional rights against government actions.Furthermore, the Chinese constitution does not establish a separation of state powers, which allows for government action to go unchecked. This results in the rule of the government being unrestricted, which is by definition a dictatorship.
Classifications of ConstitutionsA fundamental classification is codification or lack of codification. A codified constitution is one that is contained in a single document, which is the single source of constitutional law in a state. An uncodified constitution is one that is not contained in a single document, consisting of several different sources, which may be written or unwritten.Homeopathic TreatmentsThe "classification of constitution" is also a Chinese term for classifying the various aspects of the human constitution (such as the nervous system or metabolism) for homeopathic remediation.(see related link)
The government in China is communist. It is officially called the Chinese Communist Party. The current constitution was amended in 1982.
Kuan-she ng Hsieh has written: 'A brief survey of the Chinese Constitution' -- subject(s): Constitutional law
YES. The People's Republic of China has a constitution upon which the various organs of the government are based. While it is a Leninist Communist Single-Party State, this does not prevent it from having a constitution. It just happens that this constitution is one that vests all power in the government (as opposed to vesting some in the people and other powers in the government).A link to the official English translation of the current Chinese Constitution is here: Constitution of the People's Republic of China
Prince Shotoku was a famous Japanese regent. He sent Japanese people to China to study Chinese culture and art, he opened the first Japanese embassy in China and wrote the first Japan's first constitution.
Prince Shotoku implemented a centralized government system with a constitution based on Confucian principles, established Buddhism as a state religion, introduced Chinese art, architecture, and writing systems to Japan, and promoted the development of a formal education system.
No. There are a few issues with this definition.First, it does not matter what the leader says, but what the reality on the ground is. For example, you have King Mohamed VI of Morocco who is, on paper, a constitutional monarch and completely respects the Moroccan Constitution, but has effective power to do anything he wishes to do. Conversely, you have leaders in democracies who make the occasional remark that a certain provision of their country's constitution does not apply to them only to find themselves on the wrong side of the law.Second, the constitution not applying to the leader is a test a dictatorship that is not necessarily effective. The case where the constitution does not apply is an unlimited government (as opposed to a limited government where the constitution does apply to the leadership). Unlimited governments are always dictatorships. Limited governments can be dictatorships or they can be democratic or oligarchical. So, the test would exclude many countries where there are limited dictatorships, like China. (Chinese officials can be prosecuted for violating the Chinese Constitution or Laws.)However, while not all dictators are those leaders for whom the national constitution does not apply, all leaders for whom the national constitution does not apply are dictators.