answersLogoWhite

0

In appellate litigation, "standing" refers to the legal right of a party to bring a case or challenge a decision in court. To have standing, a party must demonstrate that they have suffered a direct and concrete injury as a result of the action being appealed, and that this injury can be addressed by the court. This ensures that only those with a genuine stake in the outcome can participate in the legal process, thereby promoting judicial efficiency and relevance.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2w ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How is an intermediate court different from an appellate court?

"Intermediate court" or "intermediate appellate court" usually refers to the appellate court between the trial court and final court of appeal (Supreme Court or equivalent). An intermediate appellate court is where the first appeal of a case would be filed. The term refers to the same courts, but "intermediate court" is a vague colloquialism that's not often used in the legal system; most of the time, people refer to a specific appellate court by name, or to the "appellate courts" or "court of appeals," in general.


What refers to the authority of a court has to hear a case?

The authority of a court to hear a case is its jurisdiction.


Does appellate court hears jury cases?

No. In both State and Federal systems, appellate Court Judges alone render a decision on the merits of the appeal based on the evidence contained within the record of the trial court. There are no juries empaneled in an appellate courts.


Which concept refers to changes brought on by the information revolution?

Mass protest is the concept that refers to the changes brought on by the information revolution. Public unrest is the other concept.


What does mandate mean in the Court of Appeals?

In the context of the Court of Appeals, a mandate refers to the official order issued by the appellate court directing a lower court to take specific actions in accordance with the appellate court's decision. This can include instructions to enforce a ruling, conduct a new trial, or implement changes to a legal decision. The mandate signifies the conclusion of the appellate court's review and the commencement of the lower court's compliance with the appellate ruling.


What is the difference between who and which?

"Who" refers to a person. "Which" refers to an inanimate object or concept.


What part of speech is concept?

The word "concept" can be both a noun and a verb. As a noun, it refers to an abstract idea or a general notion. As a verb, it means to conceive or form an idea.


What is original vs appellate jurisdiction?

They are in different places on the hierarchy of jurisdiction. Appellate jurisdiction is higher. Courts with appellate jurisdiction can hear appeals, whereas courts with original jurisdiction can hear cases for the first time.


The term Manifest Destiny refers to what a form of government a law a constitutional right a concept?

A concept


What does Court ref APP mean?

"Court ref APP" typically refers to a court reference in an appellate case, indicating that a case has been appealed to a higher court for review. The abbreviation "APP" stands for "appellate," highlighting that the legal matter is under appellate jurisdiction. This process allows parties to challenge the decision of a lower court based on legal errors or procedural issues.


What is the abstract concept meaning of the keyword?

The abstract concept meaning of a keyword refers to the underlying idea or concept that the word represents, beyond its literal definition.


What is the difference between justification and appellate justification?

Justification generally refers to the reasoning or rationale behind a decision or action, explaining why it is considered valid or acceptable. Appellate justification, on the other hand, specifically pertains to the reasoning used by appellate courts when reviewing lower court decisions, focusing on legal principles and precedents to determine whether the initial ruling was correct. While both involve providing reasons, appellate justification is constrained by legal standards and the review process, whereas general justification can be broader and more subjective.