Actus reus and mens rea are elements of criminal liability. To be criminally liable for a particular behavior requires a prohibited action (the actus reus) and a criminal state of mind (the mens rea). This is explained in detail in the related link below.
The fact that he committed it (Actus Rea).
Nobody is going to do your homework!
The concurrence theory of mens rea and actus reus.
§ Actus Reus (Criminal Act)§ Mens Rea (Criminal Intent)§ Concurrence (Actus Reus)§ Causation§ Harm
arm with a weapon then to commit an act of assault
Legality, Mens rea, Actus Reus, Causation, Concurrence, Harm, and Punishment
Sir Edward Coke
the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea)
Explain also, why for less serious crimes parliament has altered the level of mens rea required for conviction?
Two factors must be present in the prosecution of a criminal case. These factors are Mens Rea and Actus Reus. Mens Rea is literally translated as "guilty mind," and colloquially translated as the premeditation of a crime. Actus reus is translated literally to mean "guilty action," and means the actual commission of a crime. Without one, it is very rare to find the other. The Actus Rea is where intent comes in to play, for without the intent of committing a crime, there can be no crime, except in extreme circumstances. A prosecutor must prove that there was Mens rea involved in the commission of the crime or else the case would be extremely shaky.
There are only TWO. (1) a criminal ACT (Actus Reus), accompanied by (2) a criminal INTENT (Mens Rea).
One knows one is illegally parking a car or flying an airplane too low. Those are both matters with a guilty mind. To see a discussion of mens rea and actus reus see the link below.