RESULT CRIMES are those in which the actus reus is defined in terms of prohibited consequences irrespective of these are brought about, i.e. causing death (murder). This differs from conduct crime.
CONDUCT CRIMES are those in which the actus reusis concerned with prohibited hebabiour regardress of consequences (example: blackmail).
Conduct and result crimes are those in qhich the actus reus is defined in terms of a prohibited outcome that has to be caused in a particular way by specific conduct.
Arson involves a combination of a prohibited result (damage or destruction of property) and conduct (the property must be destroyed by fire).
The exact meaning of delict varies between legal systems but it is always centered on the Roman law idea of wrongful conduct. It's a matter of intent. Crime is not always intentional.
Having possession of a drug with the intent to supply it is generally considered a conduct crime. The crime is committed based on the individual's actions (possession and intent to supply), rather than the result (actual distribution or sale of the drug). The focus is on the person's behavior and intent rather than the outcome of the crime.
Formally defined crimes: Definitional elements proscribe a certain type of conduct irrespective of the result, i.e. rape, perjury, possession of drugs, driving negligently Materially defined crimes: (result crimes/consequence crimes) Definitional elements do not proscribe a specific conduct, but any conduct which causes a specific condition, i.e. murder, arson, culpable homicide. The act results in a certain condition, such as death of a person. Thus X's act causes the condition of Y, being death etc…
a criminal is a person who does crime, crime= something illegal.
Mostly a difference in terminology. They mean essentially the same.
your crime rate is the percentage of the crime, and the volume is the number of crimes
Essentially there is NO DIFFERENCE.
delict is less harm than crime.
any type of crime
If it is a good thing, it's the difference between an idea and an act. If it's a bad thing, it's the difference between a sin and a crime.
ANY type of assault is a crime. Virtually ALL 'crimes against persons' offenses embody SOME type of assault in them. An Armed Robbery is an assault but so too is Simple Assault (an unlawful touching). Whether it is a 'result' offense or a 'conduct' offense depends on the motive for the assault in the first place, and how it is carried out. The motive of the assaulter would have to be known before a judgment could be made as to the category that that particular assault fell into.
No.