International law is limited to each country whereas domestic law is law within a country that is followed.
There is a great difference between domestic and international laws. Domestic laws are limited to a particular country or region while international law cuts across the borders.
the difference is this is small and that is big
Under the doctrine of incorporation, a rule of international law becomes part of national law without the need for express adoption by the local courts or legislature. As a result the domestic courts have to apply a certain rule of international law as long as they there is no explicit contradicting piece of law or judgement. Differently from the latter theory, the transformation doctrine stipulates that rules of international law do not became part of national law until they have been expressly adopted by the state. To become binding on domestic authorities, the international law must transformed into national law through the various mechanisms for the national implementation of international rules freely decided upon by each sovereign State.
Yes, public International Law is a distinct type of law that governs the relationships between various subjects, such as states and international organizations, in the international community. It sets out the rules and principles that guide interactions between these actors on a global scale.
In broad terms, public international law refers to dealings between states--treaties, custom, etc.--and private international law to those laws affecting dealings between individuals (e.g. international contracts, labour deals, etc.)
International law is different from national law because international law is not enforced. All it is is a system of treaties and conventions that prevent other countries from doing things that are wrong. For instance, if you make a treaty with Britain to not force the US to join back with them, they can't "legally" do that. If they do, we can tell the countries around them to not do anything with them, and then they will suffer the consequences. This is different from national law because you get a punishment for violations of any law that your nation provides. You cannot make international laws without treaties and conventions because there is no superior court to deal with them, except the International Court of Justice. The international court of justice is where representatives get together to decide if a country has violated its treaties or other internationally-agreed conventions.
Labor law specifically deals with regulations related to employment, such as wages, working conditions, and employee rights. Social legislation, on the other hand, encompasses a broader range of laws that aim to protect and support individuals' social welfare, such as healthcare, social security, and education. Labor law is a subset of social legislation, focusing on the rights and obligations of workers and employers.
Consideration is an essential element of a legally binding contract where each party agrees to give or do something in exchange for something from the other party. In English law, consideration must be present for a contract to be enforceable, whereas in Indian law, a promise can be enforceable even without consideration under certain circumstances, such as promises made to close family members. Additionally, Indian law recognizes past consideration as valid consideration, while English law generally does not.
There is no difference. They are the same.
Pacta sunt servanda is a principle of international law and diplomacy with hold the international treaties but constitutional supremacy is the provision that generate for each countries to manage their law system in different ways.
Individual rights can be protected under public international law through instruments such as human rights treaties, declarations, and conventions. States are bound by these agreements to respect and uphold the rights of individuals, and international monitoring bodies can hold them accountable for any violations. This helps to establish a framework that promotes the protection and promotion of individual rights on a global scale.
In theory, international law can take precedence over domestic law in a country that has ratified an international treaty and incorporated it into its legal system. However, the actual hierarchy between international and domestic law varies depending on the country's legal system and constitution.
States generally adhere to international law because of a shared belief in its legitimacy and the benefits of a rules-based international system. Compliance can also be driven by reputational concerns, the desire to maintain good relations with other states, and the potential consequences of non-compliance such as economic sanctions or loss of credibility on the global stage. Additionally, structures like international organizations or treaties can provide mechanisms for monitoring and enforcing compliance.