Gun control refers to laws and regualtions that limit ownership, carrying and usage of firearms. Gun rights refers to the opposite- of the right of people to own firearms.
1968 gun control act I believe.
The pistol does not have a permanently attached stock- and it is a lot harder to control. The pistol is one handed, the gun two.
No - they could even be considered antonyms of each other.
The Democratic Party.
Mainly in the stock
Obviously not. Restrictions on military weapons such as cannons, machine guns and RPG's are not prevented by the Bill of Rights. Also, gun control against felons and in various locations are not prevented by the Bill of Rights (try to carry a .45 on an airplane). What the Bill of Rights does prevent is the arbitrary prohibition of private gun possession.
The Second Amendment is the amendment that causes the most friction between gun control advocates and the National Rifle Association (NRA). Gun control advocates argue for stricter regulations to address gun violence, while the NRA strongly defends the interpretation that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual's right to own and carry firearms. The clash arises due to the differing perspectives on how to balance gun rights and public safety.
Stock dimensions and sights
The right to keep guns is important because if you have a gun you can protect your self if you can not protect your self you can get fatally hurt.
Somebody can find the latest information on the gun control debate from US News, Forbes, Policymic, Guardian and ABC News websites. One can find news on the rights and reports regarding gun control from these sites.
California traditionally has been among states with the worst reputation in regards to the rights of gun owners. So, short answer, yes.
Pretty much. Stricter gun control and vehicle laws, though.