0
What else can I help you with?
What is the difference between the intolerable and coercive acts?
The Intolerable Acts were a series of punitive laws passed by the British in 1774. They stripped Massachusetts of self-government in 1774 after in Boston Tea Party. They were also called the Coercive Acts, so there's no difference between these terms.
What is the one difference between the Coercive Acts and The Intolerable Acts?
The Coercive Acts were a series of laws passed by the British Parliament as a punishment for the Boston Tea Party, while the Intolerable Acts were the American colonists' term for these laws due to their harsh nature. Essentially, the Coercive Acts refer to the laws themselves, while the Intolerable Acts refer to the colonists' reaction to them.
What is the difference between intolerable acts and coercive acts?
The Intolerable Acts were a series of punitive laws passed by the British in 1774. They stripped Massachusetts of self-government in 1774 after in Boston Tea Party. They were also called the Coercive Acts, so there's no difference between these terms.
What is the obnoxious acts?
It's the difference between Thomas Jefferson.
What is the difference between books and acts in the Bible?
books informs while acts in the bible transforms
Navigation acts what is it?
Navigation acts is a series of laws. These series of acts restricted the use of foreign ships for trade between Britain and its colonies
What is the difference between Canadian and American laws?
men doing men laws
Which laws directed the flow of goods between England and the colonies?
navigation acts
What is the Difference between law and laws?
law is just one law but laws is two or more laws.
What is the time difference between Victoria and Queensland laws?
The time difference between Victoria and Queensland laws is approximately 100 years. Queensland is progressive in their laws and is 50 years behind New South Wales.
What is the intolerable act and the coercive act?
The Intolerable Acts were a series of punitive laws passed by the British in 1774. They stripped Massachusetts of self-government in 1774 after in Boston Tea Party. They were also called the Coercive Acts, so there's no difference between these terms.
What is the difference between laws on the books as opposed to laws in action?
No difference. They both refer to the same thing. Laws, in order to be enforced, MUST be "on the books" (i.e.: passed).
