A constitution is a legislation direct from the people , while a statute(see Art. VI Sec. 1.) is a legislation from the people's representatives.
This is a list of U.S. states where the recognition and performance of same-sex marriage is explicitly banned either by the constitution or by statute.Alabama (by constitution and statute);Arkansas (by constitution and statute);Florida (by constitution and statute);Georgia (by constitution and statute);Kansas (by constitution and statute); (Legalization of same-sex marriage is imminent.)Louisiana (by constitution and statute);Minnesota (by statute only);Mississippi (by constitution and statue);Missouri (by constitution and statute; recognition is legal);Montana (by constitution and statute); (Legalization of same-sex marriage is imminent.)Nebraska (by constitution and statute);North Dakota (by constitution and statute);Ohio (by constitution and statute);South Carolina (by constitution and statute); (Legalization of same-sex marriage is imminent.)Tennessee (by constitution and statute)
In a statute, what is the difference between the words 'means' and 'includes' when heading a list?
Alabama (by constitution and statute);Arizona (by constitution and statute);Arkansas (by constitution and statute);Florida (by constitution and statute);Georgia (by constitution and statute);Kansas (by constitution and statute);Kentucky (by constitution and statute);Louisiana (by constitution and statute);Michigan (by constitution and statute);Mississippi (by constitution and statue);Missouri (by constitution and statute);Montana (by constitution and statute);Nebraska (by constitution and statute);North Dakota (by constitution and statute);Ohio (by constitution and statute);South Carolina (by constitution and statute);Tennessee (by constitution and statute); and,Texas (by constitution and statute).
what is the difference between Indian and Japanese population cnsus what is the difference between the development of the constitution of India and japan? what is the difference between the development of the constitution of India and japan? what is the difference between the development of the constitution of India and japan?
Because marriage was originally/is a religious rite practiced in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The religious rite requires a heterosexual couple, as all three religions consider (in most sects) homosexuality a sin. The push for same-sex marriage comes primarily for a desire for the homosexual partnership to have the same LEGAL rights as a heterosexual partnership, but because of the use of the term 'same-sex marriage' the followers of said religions fight to prevent legal sanctioning of the partnership, in many cases only to protect sanctity of their ritual, and not because they really think that it should be illegal for homosexual relationships to exist, as the greater part of the population is rather tolerant of homosexual partnerships.
comparison constitution en usa and albanian
1. What is the difference between common law and case law ?
similarity and difference between all Ethiopian constitution
Nothing they are the same.
The only difference is that constitution is the paramount law directly approved by the people while law are merely based on constitution and they are proposed by the congress.
the us constitution goes across the hole us wile Washington constitution is only
Trick question. That depends on the state statute and whether it is repugnant to the US Constitution or federal law in an area where the federal government asserts supremacy. If the statute falls under the penumbra of states' rights, then the statute is controlling and the US Supreme Court will (should) uphold it. If the statute is unconstitutional under the US Constitution and involves a part of the Constitution incorporated (applied) to the states, then the US Supreme Court decision is controlling. If the statute would be unconstitutional under the US Constitution, but involves a part of the constitution not incorporated to the states (for example, the Seventh Amendment), the Supreme Court will decide whether to apply the Constitution, which would then be binding on all states, or whether to allow the state statute to stand, in which case the state statute would be controlling.