if you mean how effective of a deterrent it is. it isn't.
states that execute more prisoners have slightly lower violent crime rates than the less hang happy states, but states without the death penalty at all average substantially lower violent crime rates.
Some capital punishment research questions that can provide insights into the effectiveness and ethical implications of the practice include: Does the death penalty act as a deterrent to violent crime? What are the socio-economic and racial disparities in the application of the death penalty? How accurate and reliable is the process of determining guilt in capital cases? What are the psychological effects on individuals involved in the execution process? What are the long-term societal impacts of using capital punishment as a form of justice?
The capital punishment in Ohio is delivered by injecting a lethal injection into the the criminal's body
The adverb form of the adjective "capital" is capitally. The appropriate meanings are in a capital (great) manner and relating to capital punishment.
lapidation
lapidation
Lethal injection or electrocution
Of course not. The US has always prohibited "cruel and unusual punishment".
Crucifixion was a form of capital punishment in ancient Rome.
Austria doesn't have capital punishment.
in the USA capital punishment is DEATH
no revenge is not justification for capital punishment
Apart from the moral problems and the limited evidence of effectiveness, there is also the undeniable fact that people are mistakenly convicted - around 1% in the USA is a widely accepted figure. If you accept capital punishment, then you have to accept that the state will execute innocent people.