According to Wikipedia - the exact wording is...
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
the first
You can read the Bill of Rights' exact wording at the link below.
You don't. It is written and interpreted exactly as stated in the Constitution. It is not subject to a change in wording.
No it does not. It mearly states that government will have no say in religion
"Alternates" or "alternate wordings" are other ways of phrasing the same exact question on WikiAnswers. When an alternate wording is asked on the site, it redirects you to the primary wording of that question. If an alternate wording is mismatched with a primary wording from which it differs, we should "split" it out into a separate question.
Civils Right Act of 1875
They narrow down your search to the exact wording typed within the quotes.
By adding the 13 amendment 14 amendment and 15you amendment
No, wording does not have to be exactly the same as a trademark to be illegal. If the wording is similar enough to cause confusion among consumers and to dilute the distinctive quality of the trademark, it could still be considered a trademark infringement. It's best to consult with a legal professional for specific advice regarding trademark issues.
the 13 amendment: you cannot prevent a person from voting because of race, color, or creed (not exactly sure)
Because laws are written differently in each state, the exact wording of the law which prohibits parents from not enrollin their kids in school will differ from location to location. When looking for the exact wordiing, it's best to remember the state one lives in to find the exact law in question.
The 13th Amendment is important because it abolishes slavery.