Judicial- the judges.
It is one of the 3 main branches of government, along with judicial and legislative.
Government is one of those terms that have multiple meanings, so it can be tricky... Apart from the parliament there is the Executive arm of government (Prime Minister and Cabinet) and the Judicial Arm of Government (The Courts)
Judicial activism was used because the Court ruled that the school policy prohibiting the students from wearing the arm bands to protest symbolically the Vietnam War violated the students' free speech rights. By overturning a policy of the government (the public school's policy), the Court exercised judicial activism.
There are three arms of power: Legislative Power, Executive Power and Judicial Power. It is the Judicial Power (The Judges) that has the power to interpret and apply laws in Australia. Courts and judges are independent of parliament and government.
The judicial branch of government has the power to interpret and apply laws. This branch is responsible for resolving disputes and ensuring that laws are applied fairly and consistently. Courts, judges, and legal systems operate within the judicial branch to uphold the rule of law and protect individual rights.
A judicial preceding can be a "judicial hearing" or a trial.
judicial branch
No governors have judicial power. That power rests with the judicial branch.
No governors have judicial power. That power rests with the judicial branch.
Unless I am missing the point of the question, I'm not understanding what the questioner is driving at. Enforcement of Judicial rulings by the authorities, is an EXTENSION of Judicial power NOT a a restriction of it.
leads the judicial branch