First, there may be specific codes within your school that cover this. Second, the rule that you need to keep in mind is "reasonable expectation of privacy." If you are inside your own home, then it is reasonable for you to expect privacy. If you are in a public place, then it is not. However, there are exceptions. If you are in a restroom, regardless of wether it is public or private, you have a reasonable expectation of privacy. The same goes for dressing room. So yes, a student can video tape a teacher, but they should think long and hard about what they are hoping to accomplish by doing it.
Are you talking about having your conversation taped by police? Basically, the rule is at least one person involved in the conversation has to know that the conversation is being recorded, otherwise there needs to be a search warrant. For example, if I were a police officer and I was talking to you, I could record the conversation without your consent or knowledge, because I am involved in the conversation, and I know it is being recorded. However, if I am a citizen talking on the phone to another citizen, a search warrent would be required because neither subject was aware of the recording being made.
Recording of the phone conversation.
All of them. However, there are rules that go with this answer:There are 12 States in the U.S. That requires ALL parties involved in the conversation (All Party Consent) to be made aware that the conversation is being recorded. These States are:CaliforniaConnecticutDelawareFloridaIllinoisMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMontanaNew HampshirePennsylvaniaWashingtonThe following 38 States require that at least ONE person (One Party Consent) involved in the conversation has given permission for the conversation to be recorded including the person doing the recording. As an example, if you were having a conversation whether in person or on the phone with multiple participants involved, and you wanted to record it, then you can do so in the following States without telling anyone you're doing so because you are a part of the conversation and in retrospect, are giving your consent to record it:AlaskaArkansasColoradoDistrict of ColumbiaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMinnesotaMississippiMissouriNebraskaNevadaNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingThis falls under the United States Code: Title 18.2511. As long as you actually take part in the conversation and are doing so in a State that allows "One Party Consent", it is quite legal to record the conversation without another party in the conversation giving permission or even being told that they are being recorded.Hope that fully answers your question..
The conversation between Socrates and Crito is an example of moral philosophy and ethics. It revolves around the themes of duty, justice, and personal responsibility, as Crito tries to persuade Socrates to escape from prison but Socrates chooses to abide by the laws of Athens and accept his fate.
There are 12 States in the U.S. That requires ALL parties involved in the conversation (All Party Consent) to be made aware that the conversation is being recorded. These States are:CaliforniaConnecticutDelawareFloridaIllinoisMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMontanaNew HampshirePennsylvaniaWashingtonThe following 38 States require that at least ONE person (One Party Consent) involved in the conversation has given permission for the conversation to be recorded including the person doing the recording:AlaskaArkansasColoradoDistrict of ColumbiaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMinnesotaMississippiMissouriNebraskaNevadaNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingThis falls under the United States Code: Title 18.2511. As long as you actually take part in the conversation and are doing so in a State that allows "One Party Consent", it is quite legal to record the conversation without another party in the conversation giving permission or even being told that they are being recorded.The answer with the States provided is exactly correct and the actual US code was provided to prove its validity. No one needs to be "Notified" in "One Party Consent" States which Missouri is indeed one of. It is true that you cannot ever record another person or persons conversation without one of the parties consent or all parties consent in the 12 named States if you're not part of the conversation, but as long as you yourself are a part of that conversation, you are permitted under that US code to record the conversation as you are that "One Party" and it is a little silly to notify yourself, don't you think? To use as an example, if I were to receive a call from a debt collector and I answered the phone while in the State of Missouri, I can start recording the conversation as soon as I answer the phone without telling the caller that I am doing so. It is what is considered "Black letter law" and can't be disputed in a Court of Law.Not without at least one party to the call or conversation being notified that recording is occurring. It is illegal in ALL states to intercept and record conversations to which you are not a party.
A "party to the conversation" means a person involved in it. For example, a conversation between two people has two parties to the conversation. A conversation between 7 people has 7 parties to the conversation.
i need how to talk to call conversation
example of telephone conversation
example for conversation factoris as follows. 1 km =1000 m . so ,here 1000 is a conversation factor.
An example of an ironic conversation could be two friends discussing the importance of punctuality while they are both habitually late for meetings and events. Their conversation highlights the irony of their words not matching their actions.
Implied
Mr. X entering into a contract with Mr. Y for sale of his house at his free will is an example of a free consent. The consent is not said to be free if it has been obtained by coercion (physical or mentral pressure or threat), undue influence (moral pressure, emotional blackmail), fraud (knowingly stating false facts), misrepresentation (unknowingly stating false facts) or mistake of facts. For example, if Mr. A threatens Mr. B regarding his life or hurting his dear ones, if he does not sell his property to Mr. A, then his consent to the contract would be under coercion and not free.