to combat difficult behavior
deregulation
Legal justification refers to the reasoning or rationale used to support a legal decision or action. It explains why a particular law or legal principle is applicable in a given situation and provides the basis for legal arguments in court. Legal justification is essential for ensuring that decisions are fair, consistent, and in accordance with legal principles.
His legal justification was that the tribes failed to subdue their land.
Moral justification: Providing reasoning or principles to support a moral or ethical decision. Legal justification: Providing evidence or reasoning to support a legal argument or decision. Rational justification: Justifying beliefs or actions based on logical reasoning or evidence.
Yes.., for all persons under the age of 11... It is also illegal for people over age 11 to ride without proper restraints... But with proper restraints.., it iss legal.
Prior restraints refer to government actions that prevent specific speech or publications before they occur, effectively censoring content before it can be disseminated. This legal concept is often considered a violation of the First Amendment in the United States, as it restricts freedom of expression. Courts typically view prior restraints with skepticism, requiring a compelling justification for such actions, as they can inhibit open discourse and the free flow of information. Examples include injunctions against publishing certain materials or government permits needed for media coverage.
governments that are characterized by legal restraints on political power
governments that are characterized by legal restraints on political power
Lawful perhaps, but without moral justification.
Substantive restraints are procedural restraints used when consulting the US Bill of Rights. Substantive restraints are not usually physical restraints.
Chapter 3 provides a justification for the study of the classics, especially the Greeks.
Justification generally refers to the reasoning or rationale behind a decision or action, explaining why it is considered valid or acceptable. Appellate justification, on the other hand, specifically pertains to the reasoning used by appellate courts when reviewing lower court decisions, focusing on legal principles and precedents to determine whether the initial ruling was correct. While both involve providing reasons, appellate justification is constrained by legal standards and the review process, whereas general justification can be broader and more subjective.