balony
Both civil and criminal cases involve legal disputes that are resolved in a court of law. In both types of cases, there are parties involved who present evidence and arguments to support their positions. Additionally, both civil and criminal cases can result in a judgment or verdict that determines the outcome of the case.
brown v. board of education
The NAACP!
I believe I was denied my civil rights in family court, 15 years ago. Is there a statute of limitations on civil rights cases? 3 years from the onset of the 1983 violation. That's it folks.
working on court cases that involve the rights of underrepresented people.
All cases start out in lower local courts to be heard. After the initial verdict the party that feels that they should have gotten a different outcome they will appeal. The Supreme Court is the highest court of appeals and the verdicts can be fought all the way to them.
Chief justice Earl Warren had seen a number of cases during his time in the supreme court. His most notable though was his ruling on civil rights cases, which ended segregation in the school systems.
working on court cases that involve the rights of underrepresented people.
working on court cases that involve the rights of underrepresented people.
working on court cases that involve the rights of underrepresented people.
For civil cases, two types of verdicts are rendered; general and special. The verdict need not be unanimous, a 3:4 will suffice. General verdict, the jury has decided the case either in favour of the defendant or the claimant (plantiff) Special verdict, a general decision is not announced (obviously) and rather the jury has answered certain factual questions, leaving the complete decision up to the court itself.
No, the exclusionary rule does not apply to civil cases. It is a legal principle that only applies to criminal cases, where evidence obtained in violation of a defendant's constitutional rights is excluded from being used in court.