One of the most convincing arguments for lowering the voting age is that young people are directly impacted by political decisions, particularly regarding issues like education, climate change, and healthcare. Allowing them to vote empowers them to participate in the democratic process and express their views on policies that affect their futures. Furthermore, younger voters tend to be more socially engaged and informed, suggesting that they can contribute meaningfully to electoral outcomes. Lowering the voting age can also foster lifelong voting habits and increase civic engagement among youth.
By having the most convincing argument backed up by the facts necessary to prove your innocence.
theyre willing to listen to reasonable argument presented with evidence.
There are many varying opinions on this. Personally I believe there are many convincing arguments against suicide. I am not religious so i will leave those arguments for someone else. The most convincing argument I can think of is that when things are bad or when life is bad they/it almost always get better. When someone is depressed they have trouble realizing that and feel it will never get better. There are certain cases, most of them with terminal illness or with someone who has permanently lost control or function of their body that make this argument harder to argue.
It can, but, as with any paper, you want to make your argument the most convincing.
circle graph
Logos
No. The most convincing argument against skarmory's legendary status is the fact that you can catch more than one of them in the same game without cheating.
a box and whisker plot showing the median number
Jordan Peterson's most convincing argument often revolves around the importance of personal responsibility and meaning in life. He posits that embracing responsibility not only leads to individual fulfillment but also fosters a more stable and functioning society. By encouraging people to confront their challenges and take ownership of their actions, he advocates for a proactive approach to personal and societal issues, which resonates with many seeking purpose in a complex world.
No, a position paper presents one side of an issue along with supporting evidence, whereas an argument paper presents multiple viewpoints on an issue and argues for a specific perspective within that debate. Position papers are more focused on presenting a stance, while argument papers involve analyzing various perspectives and arguing for the most convincing one.
I think the most convincing argument for viruses is that it strives and is capable of reproducing. This may change with the perfection of nanobots tho.add. Though whether they metabolize; or respire; or have a cell wall all count against it.
It's not. Both Hamlet and Romeo and Juliet are clearly more famous than King Lear. However, a convincing argument can be made that King Lear is the greatest of Shakespeare's works.