Full hearing
"Quash" is a legal term meaning "to void.""Exparte" means a communication of some sort that takes place without one fo the parties to the dispute being present. It is usually a communication between the judge and one side, while the other side is absent. It is rare and is usually avoided. There are times however where it is necessary and one side may make it known they are seeking an exparte meeting and the judge will determine if it is necessary and legalTherefore: To quash an exparte would be to void whatever was the result of the exparte proceeding (i.e. un-attended hearing). . . perhaps an order or a ruling of some type.
the answer is hearing.
The opposite of hearing sound would be making sound. The word speaking is more closely the opposite of listening.
The opposite of ultrasound (above the human hearing range) is infrasound (below the human hearing range).
Hearing
Exparte means is a communication of some sort, verbal, written etc that takes part without all parties being present. In the legal context it is usually a communication between the judge and one side with the other side being absent. It is rare and is usually avoided. There are times however where it is necessary and one side may make it known they are seeking an exparte meeting and the judge will determine if it is 1. necessary and 2. legal
An Ex Parte hearing is a judicial hearing without one of the opposing parties being present."Disposed proceeding as exparte" means that a hearing was held to give the opportunity to the defendant to attend but the defendant did not attend. Therefore, the proceeding can continue "ex parte."
Ultrasonic. The opposite would be infrasonic.
Some of the hearing disorders areConductive hearing lossSensorineural hearing lossNoise induced hearing loss
how does bats hearing compare to human hearing
If it's someone who has full hearing they are called hearing. If they have little hearing or are lossing their hearing they are called hard of hearing.
The restraining order is still in effect and the disparaged spouse can still get in trouble for its violation, even if the aggrieved spouse allows the other to re-enter.